SC administrator’s no-show irks Drilon | Inquirer News

SC administrator’s no-show irks Drilon

/ 04:15 AM September 08, 2015

drilon (1)

Senate President Franklin Drilon. INQUIRER FILE PHOTO / JOAN BONDOC

Senate President Franklin Drilon on Monday found insulting Supreme Court Administrator Midas Marquez’s failure to appear for the second year in the Senate hearing of the judiciary’s budget.

“The Senate President is here. The chair of the finance committee is here. The chair of the justice committee is here. I think it’s a little impolite of your court administrator not to even honor us with his presence here,” Drilon told officials presenting the judiciary budget.

Article continues after this advertisement

He was referring to Senators Loren Legarda and Aquilino Pimentel III, who chair the finance and justice committees, respectively.

FEATURED STORIES

Legarda, speaking to Drilon, said she was also wondering why Marquez was absent.

Drilon said he did not know Marquez’s reason for ignoring the Senate but added it was also a “little insulting” considering that Senior Associate Justices Diosdado Peralta and Jose Perez, as well as Sandiganbayan Presiding Justice Amparo Cabotaje-Tang were present there.

Article continues after this advertisement

At the very least, he said Marquez should just sit and listen to the budget presentation and deliberations in the chamber.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Just put that on the record,” Drilon said.

Article continues after this advertisement

In the end, though, the finance committee approved the proposed P26.6-billion budget of the judiciary.

Drilon told reporters later that as a “matter of respect and courtesy” Marquez should have been there to defend his budget.

Article continues after this advertisement

Asked whether he thought it was a deliberate move by Marquez, the Senate President said he did not know but it appeared that the court administrator had no other appointment.

“We hope in the coming years, they will be able to attend,” Drilon said.—Christine O. Avendaño

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Supreme Court

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.