Tingting Cojuangco impeachment plea vs Aquino ‘recycled’ — Palace | Inquirer News

Tingting Cojuangco impeachment plea vs Aquino ‘recycled’ — Palace

/ 12:55 PM August 27, 2015

Herminio-Coloma-1211

Communications Secretary Herminio Coloma Jr. INQUIRER FILE PHOTO

Malacañang on Thursday shrugged off a petition seeking the impeachment of President Benigno Aquino III over the now defunct Disbursement Acceleration Program (DAP) and Priority Development Assistance Fund (PDAF).

Former Tarlac governor Margarita “Tingting” Cojuangco and several others asked the Supreme Court on Wednesday to order the Ombudsman to investigate and file an impeachment complaint against Aquino.

Article continues after this advertisement

Cojuangco is the President’s aunt being the wife of his mother’s brother, Peping.

FEATURED STORIES

READ: Tingting Cojuangco, Belgica seek Aquino impeachment over DAP, PDAF

Communications Secretary Herminio Coloma Jr. said Malacañang had yet to formally receive a copy of the petition.

Article continues after this advertisement

“However, in our opinion, the suit apparently consists of recycled charges that have no basis in fact and in law,” he said.

Article continues after this advertisement

The 45-page petition for Mandamus with Preliminary Mandatory Injunction also asked for the prosecution of the proponents, authors and implementors of the DAP and lawmakers guilty of misusing the PDAF.

Article continues after this advertisement

The petitioners, including former Manila councilor Greco Belgica, Bishop Reuben M. Abante, Quintin P. San Diego, Rev. Jose Gonzales and Atty. Glenn A. Chong, said, “Considering that time is of the essence and there is great danger or risk that those involved would try to obstruct their investigation or prosecution, being in power, not to mention the need to put a stop to the interminable dilly-dallying and unwarranted excuses or dereliction of functions and duties of the concerned prosecutorial organs of the government, there is an imperious need for the Honorable Court to issue a writ of preliminary mandatory injunction directing them to act accordingly.”

The Supreme Court declared the PDAF unconstitutional after reports of the pork barrel scam surfaced.

Article continues after this advertisement

Several lawmakers were accused of pocketing commissions from the likes of Janet Lim-Napoles, who allegedly siphoned off billions of pesos in PDAF funds through bogus projects of non-government organizations under her control .

DAP, on the other hand, was declared partly unconstitutional. Kristine Angeli Sabillo

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Impeachment, Ombudsman

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.