Junjun Binay loses bid to inhibit Sereno | Inquirer News

Junjun Binay loses bid to inhibit Sereno

/ 03:03 PM June 16, 2015

Makati City Mayor Erwin Jejomar “Junjun” Binay Jr.  INQUIRER FILE PHOTO / NIÑO JESUS ORBETA

Makati City Mayor Erwin Jejomar “Junjun” Binay Jr. INQUIRER FILE PHOTO / NIÑO JESUS ORBETA

THE Supreme Court denied the petition of Makati Mayor Jejomar Erwin “Junjun” Binay that sought to inhibit Chief Justice Maria Lourdes Sereno and two other justices from the case regarding his question on the preventive suspension order imposed by the Office of the Ombudsman.

Aside from Sereno, Binay also sought the inhibition of Senior Associate Justice Antonio Carpio and Associate Justice Martin Villarama.

Article continues after this advertisement

At a press conference, high court’s Information Chief Theodore Te said “the individual justices concerned have indicated that they are not voluntarily inhibiting from the proceedings; the motion to inhibit is denied.”

FEATURED STORIES

Binay sought Sereno’s inhibition for allegedly showing bias during the oral arguments held last April in Baguio City when she interpellated counsel Sandra Coronel.

On the other hand, Binay sought Carpio’s inhibition for being the cousin of Ombudsman Conchita Carpio-Morales, the one who imposed the six months preventive suspension.

Article continues after this advertisement

Villarama’s inhibition was sought because he admitted that he knew “a lawyer from the Ombudsman office.”

Article continues after this advertisement

The mayor filed the motion after four justices already inhibited from his case last month – Associate Justices Presbitero Velasco Jr., Diosdado Peralta, Arturo Brion and Francis Jardeleza.

Article continues after this advertisement

Velasco inhibited from the case after his participation in the case following a news report that revealed he inhibited from handling a previous case involving Dr. Elenita Binay.  Velasco said he inhibited from Mrs. Binay’s case because he knew one of the parties in the case. However, he insisted that he does not know Mrs. Binay.

On the other hand, Brion inhibited from the case because his wife works as a confidential attorney for one of the Justices at the Court of Appeals while Jardeleza participated in the case as a solicitor-general. Peralta, meanwhile is the first justice to inhibit from the case. He did not sit during the first session of the oral arguments in the case.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Junjun Binay, Nation, News

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.