Group wants basic jeepney fare back to P8.50 | Inquirer News

Group wants basic jeepney fare back to P8.50

By: - Reporter / @jgamilINQ
/ 06:05 AM May 14, 2015

A transport group on Wednesday asked the Land Transportation Franchising and Regulatory Board (LTFRB) to bring back the P8.50 minimum fare for passenger jeepneys, citing rising oil prices.

“[Rep. Manuel Iway] only asked for a 50-centavo reduction but we agreed to the P1 reduction as a Christmas gift for commuters,” said Efren de Luna, president of the Alliance of Concerned Transport Organization which filed the petition for a provisional fare increase. “But now we’re at the losing end what with increasing oil prices.”

The LTFRB ordered a provisional P1 jeepney fare rollback on Dec. 11, setting the fare for the first four kilometers at P7.50 in Metro Manila, Central Luzon and the Calabarzon region.

Article continues after this advertisement

The move was in response to a petition filed in the House of Representatives by Iway for a 50-centavo fare rollback in time for Christmas.

FEATURED STORIES

“We are appealing to commuters for a win-win solution, for a compromise. We also have children to take care of,” De Luna said.

He noted that the LTFRB based the last rollback solely on oil prices which at the time were going down.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Right now, petroleum prices are at P32 per liter but once it reaches P35, we will also file a petition asking that [minimum PUJ fares] be set to at most P10,” he added.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: jeepney fare, Minimum Fare

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.