Accused justice is ‘bishop’ to his colleagues | Inquirer News

Accused justice is ‘bishop’ to his colleagues

/ 05:41 AM April 17, 2015

MANILA, Philippines–One of the two accused justices is known to be such a devout Catholic he is addressed as “bishop” in court. The other is known for uncompromising integrity throughout his career.

As two magistrates face accusations of corruption, employees of the Court of Appeals (CA) expressed their solidarity with Sixth Division Associate Justices Jose Reyes Jr. and Francisco Acosta, and challenged their accuser, Sen. Antonio Trillanes IV, to prove his allegations.

“His allegations have damaged not just the justices but the entire institution,” said Amiel de Vera, president of the Association of Court of Appeals Employees (Acae).

Article continues after this advertisement

“If he has evidence, show it, in order to spare the court from the damage of his bravado, his ‘political striptease,’” De Vera said, borrowing from Makati Mayor Junjun Binay camp’s description of Trillanes’ allegations.

FEATURED STORIES

The senator had accused Reyes and Acosta of accepting P25 million each from the Binay camp in exchange for their issuance of a temporary restraining order, and later a writ of preliminary injunction, to stop the Ombudsman’s order preventively suspending the mayor for six months while he is being investigated for allegedly taking part in a conspiracy to overprice the construction of the P2.3-billion Makati City Hall Building II.

The Sixth Division issued the injunction on April 6, putting Binay’s suspension on hold until it had ruled with finality on a petition to permanently stop the order.

Article continues after this advertisement

The Sixth Division has denied the charges, saying Trillanes’ allegations were baseless and constituted harassment.

Article continues after this advertisement

The senator, a known critic of the Binays, has vowed to produce witnesses to prove his allegations against the justices. His accusations did not include the third member of the Sixth Division, Associate Justice Eduardo Peralta Jr.

Article continues after this advertisement

“The senator should not hide under the cloak of parliamentary immunity to malign the Court of Appeals. It is the institution that’s being destroyed. It affects even us, the employees,” said De Vera, speaking on behalf of the CA’s 1,600 members.

“He should show evidence, then give it to the Chief Justice, because the Chief Justice is the one who has the deciding authority over cases involving justices, judges, lawyers,” he said.

Article continues after this advertisement

Acae is planning to undertake soon a solidarity action to “defend the honor and integrity” of the appellate court, he added.

De Vera said court employees were united in the belief that the accused magistrates were clean. He said Reyes, an active member of the appellate court’s Catholic community, was even called “bishop” for his devotion.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

“Whenever there are occasions where we need an invocation, justices always defer it to the ‘bishop,’” said De Vera.–Tarra Quismundo

TAGS: bribery, court, Court of Appeals, Francisco Acosta

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.