SC dismisses Enrile petition questioning his suspension | Inquirer News

SC dismisses Enrile petition questioning his suspension

/ 05:50 PM March 24, 2015

MANILA, Philippines – The Supreme Court dismissed the petition filed by Senator Juan Ponce Enrile that questioned the 90-day suspension order imposed by the Sandiganbayan against him.

High Court’s information chief Theodore Te said the petition was dismissed because it was already moot and academic.

“The Court denied the petition for certiorari and prohibition with prayers for injunctive or status quo ante relief challenging the Sandiganbayan’s orders to preventively suspend Senator Enrile on the ground that it was moot ad academic due to supervening events,” Te said at a press conference Wednesday.

Article continues after this advertisement

The high court noted that Enrile’s 90-day suspension has been lifted as of Dec. 1, 2014.

FEATURED STORIES

“Senator Enrile’s preventive suspension had already been served and lifted; as a result, the Sandiganbayan’s orders to this effect are already functus officio (served its purpose),” Te said.

Enrile went to the Supreme Court after the Sandiganbayan imposed the 90-day suspension order against him.

Article continues after this advertisement

In his petition he said while he recognize the disciplinary power of the Ombudsman, the law itself stated that its disciplinary power does not cover members of Congress, judiciary and those removable by impeachment.

Enrile was suspended by the Sandiganbayan after he was charged with plunder in connection with the pork barrel scam. AC

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Sandiganbayan, Supreme Court

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.