Ex-Rep. Valdez asks Sandigan to junk his PDAF scam case | Inquirer News

Ex-Rep. Valdez asks Sandigan to junk his PDAF scam case

/ 08:07 PM February 09, 2015

MANILA, Philippines – Former APEC Representative Edgar Valdez on Monday asked the Sandiganbayan to dismiss for lack of probable cause the plunder charge against him for allegedly getting at least P57.787 million in kickbacks from the pork barrel scam.

The former lawmaker also asked for a judicial determination of probable cause to junk the corruption case lodged against him.

Valdez is one of the fresh batch of former legislators accused of corruption for pillaging millions from their Priority Development Assistance Funds (PDAF) under the alleged scheme of Janet Lim-Napoles.

Article continues after this advertisement

In the motion, Valdez’s lawyers said there is no probable cause to indict him for plunder because the alleged kickbacks do not amount to the P50 million threshold.

FEATURED STORIES

The defense said the prosecution based the alleged kickbacks from the Special Allotment Release Orders (Saro) authorizing the release of P79.94 million in PDAF from 2007 to 2009.

The second basis was the 2004 to 2006 and 2010 ledger of principal whistleblower Benhur Luy, who the defense said is a polluted source because he has admitted forging PDAF transaction documents.

Article continues after this advertisement

The defense said the ledger of Valdez’s alleged kickbacks is not supported by documentary evidence.

Article continues after this advertisement

“No evidence was presented to substantiate the alleged kickbacks and commissions other than the self-serving and fabricated testimony of Luy and said entries in the business ledger,” the motion said.

Article continues after this advertisement

The defense then said if the amount based on Luy’s ledger is excluded, Valdez’s alleged kickbacks would not reach the P50 million threshold, making the plunder charge moot.

“Even if one were to assume as fact that Valdez indeed earned kickbacks… in percentages ranging from a minimum of 40 percent to maximum of 50 to 60 percent… said commissions will not meet the jurisdictional amount of at least P50 million,” the motion said.

Article continues after this advertisement

“If only for this reason, the charges for plunder against Valdez must fail,” it added.

It added that there is no credible witness or evidence presented to support the allegations of kickbacks received by Valdez.

The defense even noted that Luy wrote in his ledger that Valdez received his kickbacks at his house in Ayala Alabang Hills, Muntinlupa, which the former solon does not own.

“To be very clear, Valdez  has  no house in Ayala Alabang Hills, Muntinlupa. Furthermore, Luy’s ledger does not indicate any amounts delivered to the accused,” the motion said.

“It is most respectfully prayed of the Court to conduct a judicial determination of probable cause … and after said judicial determination of probable cause, to dismiss the cases against Valdez for lack of probable cause,” it added.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

The antigraft court last week received the plunder cases against Valdez and former Masbate Rep. Rizalina Seachon-Lanete, and the malversation raps against former Agusan Del Sur Rep. Rodolfo Plaza, Benguet Rep. Samuel Dangwa, and Cagayan De Oro Rep. Constantino Jaraula.

TAGS: corruption, Nation, News, Pork barrel, Sandiganbayan

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.