Manny ‘Pacman’ Pacquiao wins another round vs BIR | Inquirer News

Manny ‘Pacman’ Pacquiao wins another round vs BIR

/ 12:15 PM February 02, 2015

Manny Pacquiao  AFP FILE PHOTO

Manny Pacquiao. AFP FILE PHOTO

MANILA, Philippines — Boxing champion Manny Pacquiao scored another victory against the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) after the Court of Tax Appeals (CTA) denied its bid to dismiss his petition for a review of the case against him.

On July 25, 2013, Pacquiao, who is also Sarangani congressman, filed a petition before the CTA seeking a review of the BIR’s P2.2-billion assessment of his and his wife’s tax liabilities.

Article continues after this advertisement

Pacquiao later brought the case to the Supreme Court to stop the CTA from ordering them to post a P3 billion cash bond or a P4 billion surety bond in exchange for stopping the BIR from collecting P2 billion worth of taxes.

FEATURED STORIES

The High Court then issued a restraining order against the BIR and ordered the Tax Court to immediately resolve the case.

In its January 27 ruling, the tax court ordered the BIR to answer the petition for review filed by Pacquiao and his wife, Jinky.

Article continues after this advertisement

Upon the BIR’s filing an answer or upon its failure to respond within the 10-day period allotted the agency, the case will be set for pre-trial conference, the tax court said.

Article continues after this advertisement

RELATED STORIES

Article continues after this advertisement

Palace: Media to blame on uproar over Pacquiao tax woes

House bill seeks to make boxing prizes tax-free

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: BIR, Pacman

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.