Antique gov’s fate now in hands of DILG | Inquirer News

Antique gov’s fate now in hands of DILG

By: - Reporter / @santostinaINQ
/ 06:02 AM January 29, 2015

Antique Gov. Exequiel Javier. Photo from lpp.gov.ph

Antique Gov. Exequiel Javier. Photo from lpp.gov.ph

MANILA, Philippines—It’s up to the Department of the Interior and Local Government (DILG) to enforce the writ of execution issued by the Commission on Elections (Comelec) ordering Antique Gov. Exequiel Javier to cease and desist from performing the functions as governor of the province.

Comelec spokesperson James Jimenez told reporters it was now in the hands of the DILG on how it will execute the poll body’s Jan. 23 order for Javier to vacate his post.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Its enforcement is already a DILG matter, it’s now the responsibility of the DILG. The Comelec has no such capability,” said Jimenez.

FEATURED STORIES

The Comelec voted earlier this month to remove Javier from his post for suspending Valderrama Mayor Mary Joyce Roquero during the election period in 2013.

The poll body said the ruling was based on Section 68 of the Omnibus Election Code, which provides for the disqualification of any candidate or one holding office who violates the code.

Article continues after this advertisement

In a five-page order dated Jan. 12, the Comelec ruled that Javier’s suspension of Roquero was meant to “coerce, intimidate, compel or influence” her to support the governor or to “punish” her for opposing him.

Article continues after this advertisement

Last Jan. 23, the Comelec issued a four-page writ of execution of the resolution annulling the proclamation of Javier.

Article continues after this advertisement

The said Comelec order directed Interior Secretary Mar Roxas to immediately implement the writ of execution.

On Wednesday, reports came out that Javier had refused to step down from his post, citing the pendency of the motion for a temporary restraining order (TRO) he filed before the Supreme Court.

Article continues after this advertisement

According to Jimenez, the absence of a TRO from the high court means that their decision is in full effect and should be implemented.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: antique, Commission on Elections

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.