World’s journalists put pen to paper in biting solidarity
PARIS—Cartoonists and writers from around the world are reacting as they know best—by putting pen to paper—in an outpouring of anguished and biting solidarity with those gunned down at French weekly Charlie Hebdo.
Among the cartoons that went viral online was one by Australia’s David Pope: A picture of a gunman with a smoking rifle standing over a body, bearing the caption “He drew first.”
“Ultimately people who carry out these attacks can’t defeat ideas through these means and they won’t succeed,” Pope wrote, adding that he had once met a cartoonist involved in the shooting and that the attack “hit a nerve.”
“Our task is to keep doing what we do… focus our satire on those in power and those who seek to wield power in ugly ways like these gunmen and be part of a movement that promotes social solidarity, a free, open and tolerant society,” Pope wrote.
In India, cartoonist Manjul drew a plane exploding in a fireball into the Eiffel Tower, its pointy top redrawn as the nib of an ink pen.
One of the most powerful drawings had no drawing. Christian Adams’ cartoon for The Daily Telegraph in London showed a completely blank space with the heading: “Extremist approved cartoon.”
Another Telegraph cartoon showed one gunman saying to another: “Be careful, they might have pens.”
South African cartoonist
Zapiro said he hoped the attack “doesn’t have a further chilling effect on satirists, commentators and journalists; any freethinkers in society.”
“But I’m afraid that scenario is probably inevitable,” he said.
Like Charlie Hebdo, Zapiro, whose real name is Jonathan Shapiro, has drawn condemnation for daring to draw cartoons poking fun at the Prophet Mohammad.
The Financial Times was one of the few to criticize Charlie Hebdo and faced a backlash after publishing an opinion piece by its European editor that called the weekly “stupid” and “foolish.”
In an online article, Tony Barber condemned the attack, but accused the satirical weekly of “editorial foolishness” and said that it had “just been stupid” to provoke Muslims with its Mohammad cartoons.
“Some common sense would be useful at publications such as Charlie Hebdo, and Denmark’s Jyllands-Posten, which purport to strike a blow for freedom when they provoke Muslims,” he wrote.
Flemming Rose, the Danish editor at Jyllands-Posten who triggered global protests in 2005 by publishing cartoons of Mohammad, said that Charlie Hebdo was defending press freedom.
Highest price paid
“Charlie Hebdo didn’t shut up… and they have now paid the highest price for that,” Rose said.
Among the news outlets choosing to show their solidarity by running Charlie Hebdo cartoons was Spanish monthly Mongolia.
“Today we are all #CharlieHebdo and we back freedom of expression,” Mongolia’s editor, Gonzalo Boye, said.
The Instagram account attributed to mysterious British graffiti artist Banksy bore a cartoon of a pencil under the word “yesterday,” the same pencil snapped in two under “today,” and a third with the stub of the pencil, once again sharpened, under the line “tomorrow.”
It bore the simple caption “RIP.”
Many editorial pages were similarly outraged by the attack, insisting that the killings should not undermine press freedom.
France’s media erupted in fury, with the daily Liberation running the headline “We are all Charlie”—a line repeated in many other papers and echoed online with the hashtag #JeSuisCharlie.
Le Parisien went with “They will not kill liberty” while Les Echos called for people to face up to “barbarism,” publishing the last cartoon written by one of those killed in the attack.
“The hooded bastards declared war on France, on our democracy, on our values,” the paper said in an editorial.
The attack “targeted the heart of democracy—the freedom of the press,” wrote German daily Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, adding in an opinion piece that the gunmen must not be allowed to win.
“We cannot allow men with Kalashnikovs and rocket-propelled grenades to determine what we should say, write, draw and even think,” it said. That “would spell the end of the free and open society.”
Britain’s press called for a measured response, fearing the rise of Islamophobia and the far right.
Both the Daily Mail and the Daily Telegraph ran with the front-page headline “The War on Freedom” while The Guardian leapt to the defense of Charlie Hebdo, saying there was something “distinctly French about the form of offensiveness” it reveled in.
Subscribe to INQUIRER PLUS to get access to The Philippine Daily Inquirer & other 70+ titles, share up to 5 gadgets, listen to the news, download as early as 4am & share articles on social media. Call 896 6000.