Bill repealing law vs ‘premature marriage’ awaits Aquino approval | Inquirer News

Bill repealing law vs ‘premature marriage’ awaits Aquino approval

/ 03:10 PM December 19, 2014

Benigno Aquino III. INQUIRER.net/Cathy Miranda

Benigno Aquino III. INQUIRER.net/Cathy Miranda

MANILA, Philippines–A bill seeking to decriminalize “premature marriage,” or when a widow remarries less than a year after her husband’s death, is awaiting the signature of President Benigno Aquino III.

This after the House of Representatives on its last session day Wednesday adopted the Senate version of the bill repealing the crime of premature marriage under the penal code.

Article continues after this advertisement

Article 351 of the Revised Penal Code states that “Any widow who shall marry within 301 days from the death of her husband, or before having delivered if she shall have been pregnant at the time of his death, should be punished…”
Premature marriage is punishable with a P500 fine and jail time of between one month and one day to six months.

FEATURED STORIES

In the explanatory note of Senate Bill No. 1647, author Senator Nancy Binay said there is no known conviction on premature marriage, but “it is high time that Congress takes the necessary step to abolish provisions of our laws which are antiquated and serve no other purpose other than to perpetuate discrimination against women.”

The lower chamber’s version House Bill No. 5280 likewise seeks to repeal the crime of premature marriage. It was approved on third and final reading on Monday.

Article continues after this advertisement

Gabriela representatives Luz Ilagan and Emmi de Jesus, who authored the House version of the bill, said the “outdated” provision should be repealed because it “restricts a woman’s right to marry.”

Article continues after this advertisement

The solons also said the only purpose of the provision is to avoid confusion on the paternity of a child who may have been conceived during the previous marriage but born during the subsequent marriage.

Article continues after this advertisement

They said there is no need for the provision because the latest technology allows for the determination of a child’s paternity. The Family Code also elaborates on the proof of filiation, the solons added.

The proposed measure need not undergo a bicameral conference, or when both Houses of Congress meet to consolidate its versions of the bill, after the House adopted the Senate version. It will now be transmitted to the President for approval.

Article continues after this advertisement

RELATED STORIES

Senate OKs repeal of antiwomen law

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

Drilon vows passage of key, priority measures before yearend

TAGS: Luz Ilagan, Nancy Binay

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.