Steenkamp cousin: Pistorius apology not genuine | Inquirer News

Steenkamp cousin: Pistorius apology not genuine

/ 06:21 PM October 16, 2014

Oscar Pistorius attends the fourth day of sentencing proceedings in the high court in Pretoria, South Africa, Thursday, Oct. 16, 2014. AP

Oscar Pistorius attends the fourth day of sentencing proceedings in the high court in Pretoria, South Africa, Thursday, Oct. 16, 2014. AP

PRETORIA, South Africa—Oscar  Pistorius  must “pay for what he’s done” and his apology to the family of the girlfriend he killed was not sincere, a cousin of Reeva Steenkamp testified Thursday.

Kim Martin spoke on the fourth day of the sentencing portion of the double-amputee Olympian’s trial. Following the testimony, which is expected to end this week, Judge Thokozile Masipa will rule on what punishment  Pistorius  must serve after convicting him of culpable homicide for shooting Steenkamp through a toilet door in his home.

Article continues after this advertisement

“My lady, I really believe the accused, Mr.  Pistorius, needs to pay for what he’s done,” Martin testified before the red-robed judge.

FEATURED STORIES

“My family are not seeking revenge,” Martin said. “We just feel to take somebody’s life, to shoot somebody behind the door who is unarmed, who is harmless, needs sufficient punishment.”

Pistorius  was acquitted of murder for the Feb. 14, 2013 killing and found guilty of the lesser crime of negligent killing. Masipa has wide latitude when deciding on a sentence for culpable homicide, and could order a suspended sentence and a fine, house arrest, or send him to prison for up to 15 years.

Article continues after this advertisement

Defense lawyers have argued for a sentence of three years of house arrest with community service. In the first part of the sentencing hearing, they called a psychologist and social workers, who said thatPistorius  should not go to prison because of his ongoing emotional suffering. They also said his disability as a double amputee who needs prosthetic legs would leave him vulnerable in jail.

Article continues after this advertisement

Chief prosecutor Gerrie Nel has called suggestions of a house arrest sentence as “shockingly inappropriate” and wants  Pistorius  to be sent to prison.

Article continues after this advertisement

Martin, the cousin, said a prison sentence would be appropriate for  Pistorius  and that she understood the rehabilitation program in jail to be humane and dignified, contrary to allegations by one of the social workers who testified for the defense. In her sometimes emotional testimony, Martin said many people had suffered because of  Pistorius, including his own family, and that a sentence that excludes jail time would encourage the athlete to “feel within himself that what he’s done is all right.”

Zach Modise, the acting national commissioner for correctional services, testified after Martin, saying that the South African prison system compared favorably with prisons he had visited in Britain and the United States. He acknowledged problems such as overcrowding and gang activity, but said officials had made progress in combatting those problems and that some prison facilities can cater to disabled criminals, including  Pistorius.

Article continues after this advertisement

“We will be able to accommodate him,” Modise said.

However, defense lawyer Barry Roux referred to reports of an increase in alleged torture in South Africa’s prison system. He also said an imprisoned gang leader allegedly said  Pistorius  would be under threat if he is incarcerated; Modise said he was not aware of any threat.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

At the beginning of Thursday’s proceedings, Nel congratulated Judge Masipa on her birthday and people in the courtroom applauded. Masipa smiled, thanked Nel and then the testimony began on the 47th day of proceedings in the case, which began more than seven months ago.

TAGS: Crime, Judiciary, Killing, South Africa

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.