Macalintal disputes De Lima: Binay can’t be sued | Inquirer News

Macalintal disputes De Lima: Binay can’t be sued

/ 03:15 PM October 15, 2014

MANILA, Philippines—Is Vice President Jejomar Binay immune from suit or not?

Justice Secretary Leila De Lima believes that only the State and the President are immune from suit, although both the President and Vice President can only be removed from office by impeachment.

But election lawyer Romulo Macalintal disagreed.

Article continues after this advertisement
Romulo Macalintal

Lawyer Romulo Macalintal. INQUIRER.net FILE PHOTO

He believes that like President Benigno Aquino III, Binay also enjoys immunity from suit.

FEATURED STORIES

“Immunity from suit of the President, Vice-President and other constitutional officials is not provided for in our Constitution nor in any existing law. It is a mere tradition. Thus, if the President is immune from suit while in office, the same privilege could be extended to Vice-President Jejomar Binay considering that the Office of the Vice-President is regarded as a component of the Executive Department of the government,” Macalintal said Wednesday.

But he said that Binay and even the President are not immune from investigation.

Article continues after this advertisement

“However, such immunity from suit does not immune them from investigation to be conducted by the Ombudsman to determine if there are grounds for their impeachment which could be submitted to the House of Representatives which has jurisdiction over impeachment cases,” he added.

Article continues after this advertisement

“In other words, a criminal case  will not prosper because it carries with it the penalty of removal from public office which will violate the constitutional provision that these officials could only be removed by impeachment.”

Article continues after this advertisement

Macalintal said, if ever, the prosecution of the criminal case shall wait until the constitutional official is removed from or ends his or her term of office.

Macalintal explained that as early as 1984, the high court, in Lecaroz vs. Sandiganbayan, already ruled that to criminally charge an impeachable official while in public office violates the clear mandate of the fundamental law.

Article continues after this advertisement

The Department of Justice has started its probe on the allegations that Binay amassed ill-gotten wealth.

Aside from the alleged overpriced parking building in Makati that purportedly profited the then mayor of the city, Binay was accused of owning a huge chunk of land in Batangas.

RELATED STORIES

Santiago: ‘What is Binay afraid of?’

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

Speaker turns down impeach-Binay plan

TAGS: corruption, Nation, News

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.