Ombudsman axes DA execs, state teacher | Inquirer News

Ombudsman axes DA execs, state teacher

/ 05:54 AM October 14, 2014

Office of the Ombudsman.  PHOTO from www.ombudsman.gov.ph

Office of the Ombudsman. PHOTO from www.ombudsman.gov.ph

MANILA, Philippines–The Ombudsman has ordered the dismissal of two regional officials of the Department of Agriculture (DA) and an instructor at a state school for misappropriating public funds and falsifying official documents in connection with the Ginintuang Masaganang Ani High Value Commercial Crops Program (GMA-HVCC).

Ombudsman Conchita Carpio-Morales, in a 24-page decision, found Ponciano Vinuya, DA Regional Field Unit III (RFU) project coordinator, and Julita Ponce, a teacher at Bulacan Agricultural State College, guilty of grave misconduct and serious dishonesty based on a special audit conducted by the Commission on Audit.

Article continues after this advertisement

On the other hand, Elena Miranda, the RFU’s cashier, was found guilty of serious dishonesty.

FEATURED STORIES

The Ombudsman found that in November 2001, the Philippine Coconut Authority transferred P4.9 million in GMA-HVCC funds to the DA RFU III.

The RFU then engaged the services of Philippine Agriculture and Resources Research Foundation Inc. (Parrfi) as its NGO partner to conduct an impact assessment of the GMA-HVCC program at a cost of P3 million.

Article continues after this advertisement

The COA said the official receipts, vouchers and other supporting documents used to liquidate the funds had been falsified.

Article continues after this advertisement

The report said the amount actually paid to Parrfi was P150,000 and not P750,000 as Miranda had claimed.

Article continues after this advertisement

The special audit also showed that no training was conducted at the Bulacan school, while the attendance sheets did not indicate the training dates. The meals bought were also considered overpriced with Ponce signing the official receipt in behalf of Dang’s Catering Services.

The COA said liquidation vouchers and supporting documents for cash advances made by Miranda totaling P847,765 were all falsified by Vinuya.

Article continues after this advertisement

Morales said “misappropriating public funds clearly constitutes misconduct.”

In Vinuya’s case, she said, the misconduct was grave because he “willfully stole public funds” and “committed dishonesty when he falsified official receipts and financial reports in an attempt to conceal the misappropriation.”–Cynthia D. Balana

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: dismissal, Ombudsman

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.