Aquino seeks 'healthy compromise' with SC | Inquirer News

Aquino seeks ‘healthy compromise’ with SC

07:27 PM September 20, 2014

BERLIN—Talk of President Aquino wanting to remain in office hounded him in the final leg of his European trip here.

But Mr. Aquino sidestepped the issue and instead tackled the one “closest to my heart and that is not presidential term limits.”

“It is the question of judicial review,” he told his audience when asked during a forum organized by the Koerber Stiftung and the Asia-Pacific Committee of German Business Friday night.

Article continues after this advertisement

The President said he was seeking a “healthy compromise” with the Supreme Court on when it should use its power to review the actions of the two other branches of government.

FEATURED STORIES

“What we are envisioning in this dialogue is to find that healthy compromise that gives them the power to provide the check and balance, but doesn’t tend itself to want to use of a power that is very, very strong and very powerful,” he said.

Mr. Aquino said such power was supposed to be used with “restraint” but had been “used too much.”

Article continues after this advertisement

He earlier assailed the magistrates for striking down his Disbursement Acceleration Program and warned of a possible “collision” with the executive branch.

Article continues after this advertisement

Mr. Aquino distinguished between how judicial review was hardly used during Martial Law and how it was purportedly applied more often after the Marcos dictatorship.

Article continues after this advertisement

“It seems that we have swung from one end to the other extreme wherein before they didn’t want to interfere whatsoever, [but] now, it seems they feel compelled to interfere in anything and everything,” he said.

“Normally when you are in one position and you go to the extreme, if that initial position was wrong, the extreme normally is also wrong.”

Article continues after this advertisement

The President earlier said he was open to amending the Constitution if only to limit the power of judicial review.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS:

No tags found for this post.
Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.