Executive, SC don’t see eye to eye on transparency issues—Palace | Inquirer News

Executive, SC don’t see eye to eye on transparency issues—Palace

/ 07:03 PM August 06, 2014

Chief Justice Maria Lourdes Sereno. FILE PHOTO

MANILA, Philippines—Malacañang on Wednesday admitted that the Executive and the Supreme Court didn’t see eye to eye on some issues, including government transparency.

Presidential Spokesperson Edwin Lacierda, who was asked to comment on Chief Justice Maria Lourdes Sereno’s decision to snub the House hearing on the Judiciary Development Fund (JDF), refused to give his opinion on the issue but pointed out that the high court may “have a different take on it.”

Article continues after this advertisement

“We will defer to the judgment of Chief Justice Sereno. That is an another branch of government,” he said of Sereno’s refusal to attend the meeting, adding that he was not familiar with the protocols of the Judiciary and the Legislative.

FEATURED STORIES

He added, however, that the Executive Branch had “always been transparent” with the programs they implement.

“So, the Supreme Court may have a different take on (the JDF),” he said before enumerating instances when the two branches of government differed in opinion.

Article continues after this advertisement

“For instance, we in the executive branch, we would submit our SALN (Statement of Assets, Liabilities and Net Worth) to the Office of the President and submit it to the Ombudsman…So insofar as the Supreme Court, they have a different take,” he explained.

Article continues after this advertisement

On the other hand, Lacierda pointed out that the high court had denied the request of the Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism and the Bureau of Internal Revenue for a copy of the justices’ SALNs.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Perhaps they have—we have a different way of looking at things and I would defer to the Supreme Court,” he said.

Sereno on Monday wrote to Speaker Feliciano Belmonte, saying the timing and context of the hearing, which was held amid the controversy surrounding the Development Acceleration Program (DAP), left much to be desired.

Article continues after this advertisement

She added that it was inappropriate for a co-equal branch of government to invite the head of the Judiciary to share her views on proposed bills.

RELATED STORY

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

Chief Justice Sereno snubs nhealthy House probe into Judiciary Development Fund

TAGS: House of Representatives, JDF, Supreme Court

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.