Palace: No conflict in asking Congress to redefine savings | Inquirer News

Palace: No conflict in asking Congress to redefine savings

/ 09:29 PM July 30, 2014

Presidential Spokesperson Edwin Lacierda. RYAN LEAGOGO/INQUIRER.net

MANILA, Philippines — The joint resolution proposed by President Benigno Aquino III to Congress does not conflict with the Supreme Court decision declaring parts of the Disbursement Acceleration Program (DAP) unconstitutional, Malacañang said Wednesday.

Presidential spokesperson Edwin Lacierda said it is their way of asking Congress to re-define savings.

Article continues after this advertisement

“We’re now coming before Congress, we’re asking you: Can we redefine what saving is? What unprogrammed fund is?” he said.

FEATURED STORIES

“We’re not circumventing the process,” he added.

Lacierda said such clarifications on when a fund can be declared savings and when it can be accessed lies within the jurisdiction of the House of Representatives.

Article continues after this advertisement

He clarified that it does not mean that Malacañang was foregoing its motion for reconsideration before the high court.

Article continues after this advertisement

“We continue to hold on to our motion for reconsideration,” he said.

Article continues after this advertisement

However, Lacierda said they also decided to propose a supplemental budget because DAP projects needing funding could not wait for the SC’s decision.

RELATED STORIES

Aquino complies with SC ruling on DAP but…

Still defending DAP 

Understanding the DAP ruling 

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Nation, News

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.