Jinggoy Estrada confident of acquittal in plunder case | Inquirer News

Jinggoy Estrada confident of acquittal in plunder case

Sen. Jinggoy Estrada INQUIRER FILE PHOTO

MANILA, Philippines — On the eve of his arraignment on plunder charges, Sen. Jinggoy Estrada remained optimistic that he would be acquitted because of what his lawyers considered “weak” evidence against him.

But Estrada’s legal team was in no mood to celebrate even if the Office of the Ombudsman failed to amend the case against him, which would have made him the central figure in the pork barrel scam in which he has been accused of pocketing P183.7 million in kickbacks.

Article continues after this advertisement

“It’s a welcome development for us, but we’re not celebrating,” Alexis Abastillas Suarez, one of the lawyers, told the Philippine Daily Inquirer in a telephone interview on Sunday. “We can only say that we’re victorious if the case is dismissed.”

FEATURED STORIES

Estrada will be arraigned at 8:30 a.m. on Monday in the Sandiganbayan’s Fifth Division.

Two days before he surrendered to the anti-graft court last week, the senator told the Inquirer that his immediate priority was to be allowed bail.

Article continues after this advertisement

His motion for bail has already been submitted for resolution, and Suarez said the burden rested on government prosecutors to prove that they have a strong case against the senator.

Article continues after this advertisement

On Friday, prosecutors withdrew their motion to amend the information when informed by the Sandiganbayan justices that doing so might result in the release of Estrada from detention. The order to arrest Estrada was based on the original plunder complaint filed by the Ombudsman on June 6.

Article continues after this advertisement

Suarez said her camp got the impression that the filing of the case against Estrada had been “rushed.”

“Ever since and even during the preliminary investigation, we thought that the evidence is very weak. We are still confident that Senator [Estrada] committed no crime,” she said.

Article continues after this advertisement

The Ombudsman’s failed attempt to amend the information against Estrada, and earlier against Sen. Bong Revilla, has triggered fears that the government is bungling its cases against public officials and others accused in the P10-billion pork barrel scam.

Suarez said the government prosecutors should not be blamed because “they’re just doing their job.”

“It’s just that the evidence on record against Senator [Estrada] is weak,” she said.

Malacañang does not agree.

Communications Secretary Herminio Coloma said on Sunday the Department of Justice and other agencies worked to ensure that the cases would stand in court.

“[Cases cannot] be based on mere speculation,” he said in Filipino in an interview over the government-run Radyo ng Bayan. “That’s why [the government] worked to gather strong evidence, authentic documents that would support [the case] presented.”

RELATED STORIES

Estrada joins Revilla in detention on Monday

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

There’s no evidence against me–Jinggoy Estrada

TAGS: Government, Ombudsman, PDAF, Plunder, Sandiganbayan, Senate

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.