New Zealand schoolboy wins right to keep hair long | Inquirer News

New Zealand schoolboy wins right to keep hair long

/ 12:20 PM June 27, 2014

In this Monday, June 23, 2014 photo, sixteen-year-old Lucan Battison, left, with his lawyer, Jol Bates, arrives at the High Court in Wellington, New Zealand, where Battison is fighting his suspension from his Catholic high school because of his long hair. In a decision released Friday, June 27, 2014, New Zealand High Court judge David Collins found that both Battison’s suspension and the school’s hair rules were unlawful. (AP Photo/New Zealand Herald, Mark Mitchell)

WELLINGTON, New Zealand—A judge ruled Friday that a New Zealand schoolboy need not cut his hair before returning to class and that his Catholic high school had been wrong to suspend him for having long locks.

Sixteen-year-old Lucan Battison was suspended last month from St. John’s College in the town of Hastings. Principal Paul Melloy said Battison had breached a rule that states students must keep their hair short, tidy, off their collars and out of their eyes.

Article continues after this advertisement

But Battison argued his naturally curly hair would look unruly if cropped and he was prepared to wear it in a bun to comply with the school’s standards. Rather than cut his hair, the student and his family took their case to court.

FEATURED STORIES

In his decision, New Zealand High Court judge David Collins found the schoolboy’s actions weren’t harmful or dangerous to other students, didn’t amount to serious misconduct, and therefore didn’t warrant suspension. He also found St. John’s didn’t provide enough clarity in its hair rules to ensure students could comply with them.

While the school disagreed with Battison’s hairstyle, it didn’t dispute his description of himself as a “typical teenager.” In fact, the school described him in court as a “nice young man.”

Article continues after this advertisement

The judge noted that “an insight into Lucan’s character can be gleaned from the fact that in March this year he received a civil bravery award for participating in the rescue of two young women, who nearly drowned in dangerous swimming conditions at a Hawke’s Bay beach.”

Article continues after this advertisement

The judge also noted that Battison represented St. John’s in rugby and loved attending the school, in part because his faith was important to him.

Article continues after this advertisement

Battison’s parents Troy Battison and Tania Doidge said in a statement their son had never broken the rules because his bun kept his hair off his collar and out of his eyes.

“In 2014, when girls’ hair lengths at school aren’t questioned, why should the rules be different for boys?” they said.

Article continues after this advertisement

“The criticism we have received as parents has been hurtful and unnecessary,” they added.

In his ruling, Judge Collins noted that one of Battison’s lawyers had tried to provide the school board’s disciplinary committee with statements from two hairdressers, one of whom said Battison’s hair was already short and would “look like ‘an untidy afro’ if it was cut shorter,” but that the committee apparently chose not to accept the testimony.

Battison was allowed to return to his school earlier this month after the judge said he could stay in class while the case progressed.

In a statement issued Friday by St. John’s, which contains grammatical errors, Principal Paul Melloy said: “Naturally we are disappointed of the decision made in Wellington today.”

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

“The Board of Trustees are taking time to consider the judgment made by Justice Collins in terms of its impact, both on our school and on other schools.”

TAGS: Education, high court, Long hair, New Zealand

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.