Air presscons live, SC urged | Inquirer News

Air presscons live, SC urged

/ 07:17 AM June 21, 2014

Supreme Court building. RYAN LEAGOGO/INQUIRER.net

MANILA, Philippines—Press briefings should never be banned.

This was the firm stand of the University of the Philippines’ College of Mass Communication as it reminded the Supreme Court not to bar media conferences.

Article continues after this advertisement

In a statement, the UP Masscom said it recognizes that public interest may sometimes mean that not all the news can be released all the time.

FEATURED STORIES

Balancing act

Though this requires a balancing of the public need for information with the potential harm premature revelation can inflict on the same public, “a ban on live coverage is an arbitrary and often unnecessary means of achieving that end.”

Article continues after this advertisement

The UP Masscom statement was released on Friday and was signed by faculty, staff and students.

Article continues after this advertisement

The statement was in reaction to Supreme Court spokesperson Theodore Te’s banning of the live broadcast of his press briefing.

Article continues after this advertisement

Te, however, clarified the issue and said the high court has no policy barring live television and radio coverage of press conferences.

The UP Masscom noted that although Te said there was no such policy, this does not mean that he will not impose a ban in the future.

Article continues after this advertisement

Ready to oppose

“The media need to be informed that the ban will not happen again, and should press Te into making such a categorical statement. But they also have to be ready to oppose it when it does recur,” the statement added.

The college said the incident should “sharpen practitioner awareness of the essentially adversarial relationship between the media, with their public mandate of monitoring and holding public institutions to account, and government, whose relationship with the press is premised on furthering its agenda—and in some instances, managing information and concealing it from the public.”

Although Te had been a press freedom advocate before, he is now a part of the government that he had warred against in his previous job.

RELATED STORY

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

Media unplugged: SC bars live presscon

TAGS: Supreme Court, UP Masscom

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.