Transport group challenges new gov’t rule vs colorum | Inquirer News

Transport group challenges new gov’t rule vs colorum

/ 06:38 PM June 10, 2014

Video by INQUIRER.net’s RYAN LEAGOGO

 

Article continues after this advertisement

MANILA, Philippines—A transport group on Tuesday asked the Supreme Court to stop the government from implementing a new rule that imposes stiffer penalties on operators of “colorum” vehicles, or public utility vehicles plying the routes without a franchise from government.

FEATURED STORIES

In a 17-page petition for certiorari, the “Angat Tsuper Samahan ng mga Tsuper at Operator ng Pilipinas-Genuine Organization” or “Angat Tsuper/Stop & Go” also asked the high court to nullify Joint Administrative Order No. 2014-01 or the “Revised Schedule of Fines and Penalties for Violations of Laws, Rules and Regulations Governing Land Transportation” for being unconstitutional.

Jun Magno, STOP & GO Transport Coalition president. Photo by RYAN LEAGOGO/INQUIRER.net

Under the Joint Administrative Order, the fine for other first-time colorum offenders are: trucks – P200,000; jeepney – P50,000; vans – P200,000; sedans – P120,000; motorcycles – P6,000; and buses, P1 million.

Article continues after this advertisement

Apart from these fines, colorum vehicles will also be impounded for a minimum period of three months. The entire certificate of public convenience (CPC) to which the colorum vehicle belongs will be revoked, as well as their vehicle registrations.

Article continues after this advertisement

They will also be blacklisted from being used as PUVs in the future.

Article continues after this advertisement

It will take effect on June 19.

In their petition, the group told the high court that the new policy was vague because of its failure to indicate whether the penalty will be paid by the owner/operator or driver of the public utility vehicle.

Article continues after this advertisement

They added that the fines imposed is also a “”thousand percent” increase from the penalties set under Republic Act 4136 or the Land Transportation and Traffic Code of 1964.

“Lucidly, the increase was excessive, unreasonable and oppressive, and is offensive to the due process clause of the Constitution,” the petition stated.

“If for one reason or another, due to inadvertence, a full-time PUJ driver or family driver (or with similar occupation) earning P500 a day failed to bring with him his driver’s license or lost along the way without his knowledge, if caught, then his one week earnings would be taken at the expense of his family, lose his job and could no longer work,” it added.

Named respondents in the petition are Transportation Secretary Joseph Abaya, Land Transportation Office (LTO) Assistant Secretary Alfonso Tan Jr., and Land Transportation Franchising and Regulatory Board (LTFRB) Chairman Winston Ginez

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

RELATED STORY

MMDA backs stiffer fines for ‘colorum’ PUVs

TAGS: colorum, Nation, News

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.