Manila solon files perjury raps vs Napoles | Inquirer News

Manila solon files perjury raps vs Napoles

/ 06:24 PM June 10, 2014

Rep. Amado Bagatsing.  PHOTO from congress.gov.ph

MANILA, Philippine—Manila Representative Amado Bagatsing on Tuesday filed perjury raps against Janet Lim-Napoles for implicating him in the pork barrel scam.

According to his complaint-affidavit provided to the media, Bagatsing filed the charges before the Makati city prosecutor.

Article continues after this advertisement

He alleged that Napoles spread false information under oath when Napoles accused Bagatsing of coursing P1 million in pork barrel funds to a Napoles nongovernment organization.

FEATURED STORIES

According to Napoles in her sworn affidavit, Bagatsing supposedly received a 40-percent rebate of the project cost implemented by the Technology Resource Center through Napoles’ “Masaganang Ani Para sa Magsasaka Foundation.”

Napoles said Mina Nieva, the daughter of the late Rep. Ernesto Nieva, received the commission for Bagatsing as well as for her father.

Article continues after this advertisement

In his complaint, Bagatsing said he could not have implemented a project in 2007 because he supposedly only received his Priority Development Assistance Funds (PDAF) in January 2008.

Article continues after this advertisement

He also said the signatures in the letters to TRC were forged and the letterhead was also falsified.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Significantly, I did not receive nor authorized any person to receive in my behalf a rebate or commission from the transactions involving a Napoles NGO in her PDAF dealing with TRC,” the complaint read.

In an affidavit attached to the complaint, Mina Nieva had also denied allegations that she served as a middle person between Napoles and lawmakers.

Article continues after this advertisement

Plunder and graft charges were filed against lawmakers, officials and accused mastermind Napoles purportedly involved in the scam.

The pork barrel in the form of PDAF has been seen as a tool for political patronage and corruption.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

The practice of allotting billions of public funds to lawmakers for them to ease poverty in their constituencies was struck down by the Supreme Court as unconstitutional at the height of the investigation on the scam.

TAGS: News, Perjury

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.