De Lima wants ‘proof’ Napoles’ affidavit true | Inquirer News

De Lima wants ‘proof’ Napoles’ affidavit true

/ 01:49 PM June 06, 2014

Justice Secretary Leila de Lima INQUIRER FILE PHOTO

MANILA, Philippines–Without supporting documents, businesswoman Janet Lim Napoles cannot prove that the contents of her affidavits are true, Justice Secretary Leila De Lima said Friday.

Napoles, through her lawyer Bruce Rivera, said they were opting to have a tight hold on the documents in his client’s possession related to the pork barrel scam after the Ombudsman denied her request for immunity.

Article continues after this advertisement

“If she will not give the documents we need for the vetting and verification process [of her affidavits], how can she prove that she is telling the truth,” De Lima said, adding that giving the documents will help Napoles.

FEATURED STORIES

“She needs to cooperate. We need proof, not only her words,” De Lima said.

The DOJ and its attached agency — the National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) is asking Napoles to provide them the Special Allotment Release Order (SARO), the endorsements from the Department of Budget and Management and the implementing agencies.

Article continues after this advertisement

De Lima said they never gave the Napoles camp any promise that the request of immunity would be granted and would talk to her lawyers.
RELATED STORIES

Napoles bid for immunity junked
Janet Napoles and the pork barrel scam

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Bruce Rivera, DoJ, Immunity, Leila de Lima, Ombudsman, Politics, Pork barrel

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.