Finally, Estrada gets copies of ‘pork’ affidavits | Inquirer News

Finally, Estrada gets copies of ‘pork’ affidavits

By: - Deputy Day Desk Chief / @TJBurgonioINQ
/ 07:10 AM May 09, 2014

Sen. Jinggoy Estrada: No charges anytime soon. INQUIRER.net FILE PHOTO

MANILA, Philippines—Amid speculations that he and Senators Juan Ponce Enrile and Ramon Revilla Jr. will soon be indicted over the pork barrel scam, Sen. Jinggoy Estrada on Thursday saw his receipt of copies of witness affidavits from the Office of the Ombudsman as a sign that the antigraft body would not be filing any charges against them anytime soon.

After all, he said he had been given five days to respond to the affidavits after receiving them on Thursday.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Tomorrow might be too soon,” he said Thursday of Revilla’s earlier claim that the Ombudsman would rule on their motions for reconsideration on the plunder complaint Friday.

FEATURED STORIES

Estrada on Wednesday petitioned the Supreme Court to nullify the Ombudsman’s ruling finding probable cause to file plunder charges against him.

He argued that the Ombudsman had rejected his request for copies of the affidavits of witnesses Ruby Tuason and Dennis Cunanan, who both testified on the scam in the Senate investigation.

Article continues after this advertisement

Warning to De Lima

Article continues after this advertisement

Revilla, meanwhile, warned Justice Secretary Leila de Lima and Ombudsman Conchita Carpio Morales against abbreviating the process to indict them.

Article continues after this advertisement

Like Estrada, he claimed that his motion to be furnished copies of the sworn statements of Cunanan and witnesses Gondelina Amata and Alexis Sevidal was also denied by the Ombudsman.

Revilla said he was worried about the reports that De Lima and Morales would skip certain legal proceedings and file charges against him.

Article continues after this advertisement

“If they do that, our legal system will now be open to more abuses by the ones who are supposed to be entrusted to uphold the law, like the Department of Justice and the Ombudsman. Otherwise, there’s no law to follow,” he said in a statement.

Estrada couldn’t say if his receipt of the affidavits on Thursday would render his petition with the high tribunal moot.

“Not exactly moot because we were asking for them to nullify the proceedings because we were not given the opportunity,” he said.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

Otherwise, Estrada said he was resigned to the prospect of the Ombudsman indicting them before the Sandiganbayan antigraft court.

TAGS: Ombudsman, Philippines

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.