Ombudsman OKs plunder raps vs Enrile, Estrada, Revilla, Napoles | Inquirer News

Ombudsman OKs plunder raps vs Enrile, Estrada, Revilla, Napoles

/ 02:56 PM April 01, 2014

MANILA, Philippines – The Office of the Ombudsman on Tuesday said it found probable cause to file plunder and graft charges against Senators Juan Ponce Enrile, Jose “Jinggoy” Estrada and Ramon “Bong” Revilla Jr, as well as alleged pork scam mastermind Janet Lim-Napoles.

Senators Juan Ponce Enrile, Jinggoy Estrada and Ramon Revilla Jr. (from left). INQUIRER FILE PHOTOS

The anti-corruption agency said the basis was the plunder complaints filed by the National Bureau of Investigation last September 2013.

 Recommended charged with plunder were:

Article continues after this advertisement

* Revilla who was alleged to have received kickbacks amounting to P224.5    million

FEATURED STORIES

* Estrada with P183.79 million kickbacks

* Enrile with P172.8 million kickbacks

Article continues after this advertisement

Napoles, meanwhile, is facing plunder charges, malversation, and corruption of public officials by using dummy non-government organizations that supposedly pilfered government money from the Priority Development Assistance Fund (PDAF) of the lawmakers.

Article continues after this advertisement

 The Ombudsman’s action came hours after the Senate blue ribbon committee recommended the filing of appropriate charges such as plunder against the three senators.

Article continues after this advertisement

Janet Lim-Napoles. INQUIRER FILE PHOTO

In their joint resolution on the three senators, the Ombudsman said it found probable cause to indict Revilla with one count of plunder and 16 counts of graft; Enrile with one count of plunder and 15 counts of graft; and Estradawith one count of plunder and 11 counts of graft.

 The anti-corruption agency said the senators’ following PDAF were “never used for the intended projects” – Revilla with P517 million PDAF, Enrile with P345 million PDAF, and Estrada with P278 million PDAF.

Article continues after this advertisement

Instead, these government monies were “misappropriated and converted to the personal use and benefit of (the senators) in conspiracy with Napoles and the rest of respondents,” the agency said.

 “In fine, the PDAF-funded projects of Senators (Enrile, Estrada and Revilla) were ‘ghost’ or inexistent,” the Ombudsman said.

 The court also said the documents used for PDAF releases such as “Disbursement, Progress, Accomplishment, Fund Utilization, Inspection, Delivery Receipts and Delivery Reports, (and) Certificates of Acceptance” “were all fabricated.”

 “The livelihood and agricultural production kits/packages never reached the intended beneficiaries, i.e., either there were no projects or goods were never delivered,” the Ombudsman said.

The agency also said mayors and municipal agriculturists “denied having received anything from the Office of Senator, the (Implementing Agency) or any of the project partners.”

“The mayors or municipal agriculturists were not even aware of the projects,” the Ombudsman said.

In the end, the Ombudsman said its on-site field verification validates that the Commission on Audit report on the PDAF from 2007 to 2009 “jibe” with the whistleblowers’ testimonies on the power barrel scam.

 The pork barrel scam is an elaborate scheme of siphoning lawmakers’ PDAF to questionable NGOs for non-existent projects. These funds were instead converted to kickbacks among the senators, their personnel, and Napoles.

Napoles is currently detained at Fort Santo Domingo in Laguna for the non-bailable illegal detention case.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

RELATED STORIES

 Senate body recommends plunder raps vs Enrile, Estrada, Revilla

Cunanan dares Enrile, Estrada, Revilla to submit to lifestyle check

Tuason backs Luy vs EnrileEstrada

TAGS: Nation, News, Pork barrel

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.