Ban on political dynasties in Charter should be self-enforcing—Santiago | Inquirer News

Ban on political dynasties in Charter should be self-enforcing—Santiago

By: - Reporter / @MAgerINQ
/ 08:23 PM March 21, 2014

Sen. Miriam Defensor-Santiiago INQUIRER FILE PHOTO

MANILA, Philippines—Instead of passing a law against political dynasty, Senator Miriam Defensor-Santiago is proposing  a “self-enforcing” prohibition that can be introduced as an amendment to the Constitution.

Santiago, chairman of the Senate committee on constitutional amendments, noted a “very strong movement” in the House of Representatives to change the Constitution but warned that any amendment could not be restricted to economic provisions.

Article continues after this advertisement

“My only caveat or warning is, that once you decide to change the Constitution, you cannot  by law, limit the change or amendment of the Constitution to just for a particular point,” she told reporters on Friday.

FEATURED STORIES

“There are opinions of the Supreme Court ruling that once Congress has made a decision to open the Charter to change, it cannot limit what a Constitutional Convention or a Constituent Assembly can do. You cannot say just limit it to economic provisions. That will go against the ratio decidendi of the cases decided by the Supreme Court. So if that’s going to happen, I generally do not want the Constitution to be amended so soon.”

“But I’m dying to introduce an amendment so that, for  example, the prohibition against dynasties should be self-enforcing instead of leaving it to Congress to pass the proper law,” she said.

Article continues after this advertisement

Santiago noted that until now, Congress has never passed a law against dynasties “notwithstanding that there is a commandment in the Constitution for them to do so.”

Article continues after this advertisement

Another provision that Santiago wants to see in the Constitution is the one that would require at least a college degree before a candidate can run for national office.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Right now, there is even no educational qualifications. Right now in our statute books, people who apply to become policemen must be at least college graduates. There is no such provision for a presidential candidate so any idiot can run for president and possibly poll a certain number of votes among his fellow idiots.”

“So we should make it of record that the Constitution should require the candidate to be at least candidate for national office– president, vice president,  senator – to be at least a college graduate and maybe even include representatives,” Santiago added.

Article continues after this advertisement

RELATED STORY

Church to join fight vs political dynasties

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Congress, Constitution, Laws, Politics

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.