SC tells Makati court: Hands off Cocolife case | Inquirer News

SC tells Makati court: Hands off Cocolife case

/ 03:38 PM March 16, 2014

INQUIRER FILE PHOTO

MANILA, Philippines–The Supreme Court stopped the Makati City Regional Court from acting on the case filed by United Coconut Planters Life Assurance Corporation (Cocolife) against the government to cash in their claim on the over P1.6 billion worth of shares in San Miguel Corporation.

In a resolution, the high court also gave Cocolife 10 days to answer PCGG’s petition.

Article continues after this advertisement

PCGG through Solicitor General Francis Jardeleza said the Makati Court committed grave abuse of discretion when it denied the government’s bid to dismiss the case filed against it by Cocolife.

FEATURED STORIES

It explained that in acting on the case filed by Cocolife to stake its claim over portions of the 24 percent block shares in San Miguel Corporation, the lower court “effectively reviewed the consolidated decision of the Honorable Court declaring that CIIF (Coconut Industry Investment Fund) companies, the 14 Holding Companies and the CIIF block of SMC shares are owned by the government to be used only for the benefit of the coconut farmers and for the development of the coconut industry.”

Assuming that there is still no Supreme Court ruling, Jardeleza said the Makati Court has no authority to hear ill-gotten wealth cases. He said only the Sandiganbayan has that authority.

Article continues after this advertisement

“PCGG is entitled to the relief demanded which consists in restraining respondent Judge from further hearing the case. Indeed, respondent Judge encroached on the exclusive authority of the Sandiganbayan to hear cases involving ill-gotten assets,” Jardeleza stated in the petition.

Article continues after this advertisement

Cocolife wanted the amount be deducted from the coco levy fund, which the high court already declared as belonging to the government.

Article continues after this advertisement

But the government insisted that the case has dragged on for 25 years, saying “Cocolife should have taken the necessary steps and made known its alleged interest” and not wait for the case to reach the high court and become final and executory.

Cocolife wants to be declared a proportionate owner of the CIIF companies, the 14 CIIF Holding Companies and the CIIF block of SMC shares.

Article continues after this advertisement

The Sandiganbayan, in its ruling, said that the 14 CIIF holding companies used borrowed funds from United Coconut Planters Bank to acquire the SMC shares in the aggregate amount of P1.656 billion.

RELATED STORIES

‘Help coco farmers by returning levy’

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

Coco tillers ask Aquino: What happened to levy fund?

TAGS: Nation, News, Supreme Court

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.