Belo loses bid to revive perjury charge vs former patient | Inquirer News

Belo loses bid to revive perjury charge vs former patient

/ 04:59 PM January 06, 2014

Dr. Vicki Belo. FILE PHOTO

MANILA, Philippines — A Quezon City court has dismissed a petition by cosmetic surgeon Vicki Belo to reconsider the dropping by another judge of a perjury charge against a former patient who had sued her for an allegedly botched buttocks implant.

Judge Germano Francisco Legaspi of the Quezon City Regional Trial Court’s Branch 77 said in a ruling dated Dec. 16, 2013 but released only on Monday that Judge Nadine Jessica Corazon Fama of the local Metropolitan Trial Court did not commit grave abuse of discretion when she approved the dropping of the perjury charge against businesswoman Josefina Norcio and denied Belo’s appeal for a judicial determination of probable cause.

Article continues after this advertisement

Belo, in a petition for certiorari, had questioned two orders issued by Fama on October 31, 2012 and March 25, 2013. The first granted the withdrawal of the perjury information sought by the city prosecutor as its filing had been done without authority and the second, dismissing her appeal for the judge to determine probable cause in the case.

FEATURED STORIES

Legaspi ruled that Belo’s petition naming Fama and Norcio respondents was “bereft of merit.”

The judge said that based on court records, the information for perjury was filed on Aug. 17, 2012 by  prosecutor Fabinda Delos Santos in the MTC’s branch 38 without the approval of city prosecutor Donald Lee and, thus, it had to be withdrawn.

Article continues after this advertisement

He cited a provision of the revised rules of court which requires the “prior written authority or approval of the city prosecutor before the filing of an information in court.” Legaspi ruled, “The public respondent (Fama) correctly granted the public prosecutor’s motion to withdraw the information on Oct. 31, 2012.”

Article continues after this advertisement

Likewise, Legaspi said that without any criminal information, as an effect of its withdrawal, it was proper for Judge Fama to have denied Belo’s motion for judicial determination of probable cause.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Any determination or assessment to be made by the public respondent (Fama) after the withdrawal of the information will be pointless, if not irregular,” he stressed, adding that Belo’s request for the judge to determine probable cause had been denied based on the withdrawal of the information.

Legaspi further pointed out that Fama had approved the withdrawal of the criminal information because it had been filed without the authority and approval of the city prosecutor who had already found no probable cause to warrant Norcio’s trial for perjury.

Article continues after this advertisement

“All told, the public respondent did not gravely abuse her discretion when she issued the two challenged orders,” he said, pointing out that grave abuse of discretion entails arbitrary or despotic exercise of power out of passion or prejudice which results in evasion or refusal to perform a positive duty mandated by law.

RELATED STORY:

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

Belo files perjury raps against former patient

TAGS: cosmetic surgery, Judiciary, Metro, Perjury, Quezon City, Vicki Belo

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.