‘No attack on freedom of the press’ | Inquirer News

‘No attack on freedom of the press’

Vice Governor Magpale says Anti-Tabloid Ordinance meant to protect children
/ 08:42 AM September 06, 2011

I do believe in freedom of speech, but there are areas in which media have,  for us listeners and readers, gone overboard.”

This was the statement of Cebu Vice Gov. Agnes Magpale, author of the Anti-Tabloid Ordinance pending at the Cebu Provincial Board when sought to comment on the ongoing celebrations of Broadcasters’ Month and the coming 17th Cebu Press Freedom Week.

The PB yesterday unanimously approved a resolution authored by Board Member Arleigh Sitoy urging media organizations to sustain efforts to celebrate press freedom.

Article continues after this advertisement

“I’m one with you (the media), but I have this mandate to protect the young ones,” Magpale said in an interview.

FEATURED STORIES

“So I ask for your understanding.”

Magpale said she was among those who campaigned for academic freedom in her younger days, but some groups requested her to lead the fight against lewd content in the media.

Article continues after this advertisement

“This is not to suppress  freedom,” she said. “You (media) know that I just want to tone down (lewdness) and protect our children,” she said.

Article continues after this advertisement

Magpale commended Cebu media for being a great help in governance.

Article continues after this advertisement

“The media in Cebu is very powerful; more powerful than the media in Manila,” she said.

“I should not be the one to put you down. Far from it. I am just making a request.”

Article continues after this advertisement

The Anti-Tabloid Ordinance of 2011 is with the  PB’s committee on  laws for further study.

The ordinance seeks to ban the publication of sensationalized, sexually provocative content in local tabloids.

The Cebu Medical Legal Aid group, an adjunct of the Cebu Citizens Press Council, recently issued a statement opposing the proposed ordinance.

“While the proponents are apparently well intentioned, concerned about protecting community values and Cemla rejects obscenity, we believe the proposal is unconstitutional, unnecessary and dangerous,” Cemla said.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

“The ordinance may be open to abuse as determination of what is obscene is left to town and city mayors who may have grudges against publications that publish adverse news or opinion.” /Carmel Loise Matus, Correspondent with a report from USJ-R Masscom Intern Giovanni F. Garcia

TAGS: Media, press freedom, tabloids

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.