Afghan leaders gather for security debate amid 'apology' row | Inquirer News

Afghan leaders gather for security debate amid ‘apology’ row

/ 09:13 PM November 20, 2013

KABUL, Afghanistan—Afghan tribal leaders gathered Wednesday ahead of a debate on a key security pact with the United States, as a row over an “apology” letter threatened to distract from make-or-break issues of sovereignty.

Tribal chiefs are assembling in Kabul for a grand assembly that will open on Thursday to discuss the deal under which up to 16,000 US troops will remain in Afghanistan after the bulk of North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) forces withdraw by the end of 2014.

The so-called Bilateral Security Agreement (BSA) is seen as vital to lasting security in the war-torn nation, where the Taliban insurgency this year reached levels of violence not seen since 2010, according to the United Nations.

Article continues after this advertisement

A similar deal between the US and Iraq collapsed in 2011 over whether American troops would be answerable to local courts or those in the US, leading Washington to pull out its forces completely.

FEATURED STORIES

The same issue has dogged protracted negotiations with Kabul, leading some to fear the Iraq “zero option” would be repeated and the country would plunge into violence as local forces struggle to quell the Taliban.

Progress appears to have been made on another issue touching on Afghan sovereignty which threatened to derail the BSA— whether US troops will be able to search Afghan homes.

Article continues after this advertisement

Aimal Faizi, President Hamid Karzai’s spokesman, told reporters in Kabul on Tuesday they had agreed US forces could search homes, but only in “extraordinary circumstances” where there was an urgent risk to life.

Article continues after this advertisement

Officials in Washington struck a cautionary note, saying there was still some way to go before reaching a final agreement on the pact.

Article continues after this advertisement

‘Apology’ row

Threatening to overshadow the crucial last steps on the BSA was an unexpected row which blew up late on Tuesday over whether or not the US would apologize for mistakes made during the Afghan war.

Article continues after this advertisement

US National Security Advisor Susan Rice told CNN on Tuesday said there was “no need” for Washington to apologise.

Her stern remarks came after Faizi said Karzai expected a letter from President Barack Obama acknowledging US military mistakes during the war and Afghan suffering.

Civilian casualties and incidents such as the accidental burning of Korans in February 2012 have caused huge anger and resentment among Afghans.

US officials said the request for a letter had come from Karzai himself during a phone call with Secretary of State John Kerry on Tuesday.

Analyst Ahmad Saeedi said that the row was confected to assuage domestic concerns.

“Karzai just wants to show he is a national hero who has been bargaining with the US for national interests till the last moment,” Saeedi said.

The loya jirga has a consultative role and the BSA will also have to be passed by the Afghan parliament.

The Taliban have branded the meeting a US-designed plot, vowing to pursue and punish its delegates as traitors if they approve the BSA.

The BSA will determine how many US soldiers stay in Afghanistan when most of NATO’s troops deployed in the country since 2001—currently numbering 75,000—leave at the end of 2014.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

Highlighting the ongoing security challenges facing Afghanistan, a Taliban suicide bomber on Saturday struck close to the venue where the meeting is set to be held killing a dozen people, most of them civilians.

TAGS: Afghanistan, Defense, Diplomacy, Unrest

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.