Lawyer questions basis of DILG probe findings on Two Serendra unit blast | Inquirer News

Lawyer questions basis of DILG probe findings on Two Serendra unit blast

/ 08:40 AM October 10, 2013

A section of Two Serendra condominium hit by an explosion in the upscale Bonifacio Global City. INQUIRER FILE PHOTO

MANILA, Philippines—Where is the evidence—CSI style?

This was the pronouncement of lawyer Raymond Fortun to those who came out with the report that said criminal charges could be filed against his client—the owner of the unit at Two Serendra where the May 31 explosion that killed several people took place.

Article continues after this advertisement

According to Fortun, who spoke to reporters after the weekly Fernandina forum in San Juan City on Wednesday, the findings of the InterAgency Task Force that conducted the investigation into the blast in Unit 501-B owned by his client Marianne Cayton, were mere “speculation” sans a forensic investigation.

FEATURED STORIES

“What was the forensic investigation that was conducted? If you watch CSI, they trace (everything)…(Here), they speculated about something without any evidence,” Fortun said.

Fortun cited as an example a portion of the IATF report (which has been uploaded on the Department of the Interior and Local Government website) which said that the explosion was caused by a gas leak brought about by a detachment of the hose connecting the unit gas range to the building’s main gas line.

Article continues after this advertisement

The task force had concluded the hose had fallen on the ground based on paint drippings found perpendicular to the hose and on the floor, Fortun said.

Article continues after this advertisement

The detachment had been caused by workers’ movement of the gas range 22.9 cm from its original position, as approved by Cayton, the report said.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Where the paint is concerned, how did they know that? Unless there’s… a pattern. If it’s only one line of paint, it’s possible someone was just painting (there before),” he said.

“If you watch CSI, they trace (everything),” he said.

Article continues after this advertisement

Fortun also questioned the IATF finding that  the clamp used to lock the hose connected to the gas range was loose before the explosion, which, the IATF said, meant the workers did not properly refit the hose.

“My question is, how did they know that was loose before the explosion? Or maybe it became loose after the explosion,” Fortun said.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

“When it comes to the evidence, sasabit at sasabit talaga sila (they will trip and keep on tripping). It saddens me what they did,” he said.

TAGS: Explosion, lawyers, Two Serendra

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.