Junie insists: No warrant served on Clavel | Inquirer News

Junie insists: No warrant served on Clavel

/ 07:26 AM July 19, 2013

FORMER Cebu 4th District Rep. Clavel Asas-Martinez has not been served the warrant of arrest issued by the Sandiganbayan in connection with the graft case filed against her in 2003, her husband Bogo City Mayor Celestino “Junie” Martinez Jr. said.

Mayor Martinez, who was in the Capitol yesterday morning, was irked when reporters questioned him on the status of the warrant.

He said they only knew about the warrant from the media. Even his wife whom he said is in Manila did not receive a copy of the warrant.

Article continues after this advertisement

Mayor Martinez branded the report as mere propaganda allegedly hatched by the Salimbangons, their political rivals in the fourth district.

FEATURED STORIES

“You know you’re very unfair to us that’s why I won’t bother to answer. That was just a propaganda of the Salimbangons,” he said.

Should the warrant gets served, Mayor Martinez said they can “always post bail” and appeal the decision.

Article continues after this advertisement

The Sandiganbayan Second Division has recommended P40,000 bail for the graft case while no bail was recommended for the malversation case.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Mrs. Martinez is in Manila that’s why we’re surpised. Anyway, there are still other legal remedies so nothing is final yet,” he said.

Article continues after this advertisement

The graft case against former congresswoman Martinez and six others stemmed from allegations that a P10 million allocation for the Girl Scout of Philippines (GSP) anti-drug campaign was deposited in her personal account.

Others named respondents were: Clavel’s son, former Bogo City Mayor Celestino “Tining” Martinez III; her daughter and former GSP treasurer Ma. Cielo Martinez; municipal treasurer Rhett Minguez; municipal accountant Cresencio Verdida; bookkeeper Rhodariza Kilantang and GSP Cebu Council cashier Julieta Quino.

Article continues after this advertisement

The Office of the Ombudsman indicted them for violation of Section 3(e) of Republic Act 3019 or the Anti-graft and corrupt practices act and malversation of public funds.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS:

No tags found for this post.
Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.