Aerial spray of pesticides resumes as SC ruling hangs | Inquirer News

Aerial spray of pesticides resumes as SC ruling hangs

/ 10:51 PM July 02, 2013

DAVAO CITY – Further delay in the Supreme Court’s ruling over a city ordinance banning aerial pesticide spraying exposes more children to pesticide drifts as classes have started, environment groups said.

“On top of the usual lack of classrooms and teachers, schoolchildren near banana plantations endure an added risk to their health by inhaling pesticide drifts as classes start,” said Dagohoy Magaway, head of the group Mamamayan Ayaw sa Aerial Spraying (Maas).

He said a meeting with affected communities in February revealed that parents are increasingly getting worried about pesticide drifts, as spray planes resumed aerial spraying in the city’s agricultural districts of Wangan and Dacudao.

Article continues after this advertisement

In 2007, the city council passed an ordinance banning aerial spray among banana plantations, but a strong lobby from banana growers and exporters belonging to the Philippine Banana Growers and Exporters Association (PBGEA) put its implementation on hold.

FEATURED STORIES

Business groups questioned the constitutionality of the ordinance at the Court of Appeals (CA), which overturned a lower court decision in favor of PBGEA, and prompted the group Maas to elevate the case to the Supreme Court.

But until now, the Supreme Court has yet to issue its final ruling. Germelina Lacorte, Inquirer Mindanao

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: environment, News, pesticides, Regions

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.