Court junks bid vs indictment of 2 Ampatuans in massacre case | Inquirer News

Court junks bid vs indictment of 2 Ampatuans in massacre case

/ 05:01 PM June 07, 2013

MANILA—A Quezon City court has thrown out the petitions of two Ampatuans challenging their indictment for the 2009 Maguindanao massacre for which they have not yet been arraigned.

Judge Jocelyn Solis-Reyes of Regional Trial Court Branch 221 dismissed for lack of merit the petitions of Akmad “Tato” Ampatuan Sr. and Sajid Islam Ampatuan.

Akmad is a son-in-law and nephew of clan patriarch Andal Ampatuan Sr. while Sajid Islam is a son of Andal Sr. and is the brother of principal accused Andal Ampatuan Jr.

Article continues after this advertisement

The court denied the two accused’s separate pleadings in a four-page omnibus order dated June 6. It said the accused’s arguments had already been raised in earlier motions which the court had denied.

FEATURED STORIES

The two Ampatuans are challenging the court’s ruling allowing the prosecution to include their names on the list of the accused.

Reyes, in her order, pointed out that the court has ruled on the existence of probable cause to hold the accused, including Akmad and Sajid Islam, liable for 58 counts of murder.

Article continues after this advertisement

“There is no cogent reason to discuss the same considering that it had already discussed its reasons in denying the previous motions,” the court pointed out.

Article continues after this advertisement

The two were among the five arrested Ampatuans who have not yet been arraigned, the others being Anwar Sr., his sons Anwar Sajid “Ulo” and Anwar “Ipi” Jr.

Article continues after this advertisement

In his May 2011 omnibus motion, Sajid Islam alleged that there was  no legal or factual basis to charge him since there was an implied admission that he was not at the crime scene during the the killings.

The accused said the only basis for the filing of charges was the alleged perjured affidavit of prosecution witness Kenny Dalandag.

Article continues after this advertisement

For his part, Akmad claimed in a Sept. 2011 motion that there was no evidence showing his participation and that Dalandag never mentioned his name in his affidavit.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: court, indictment, Metro

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.