Polling firms ‘massaging’ surveys, Trillanes claims | Inquirer News

Polling firms ‘massaging’ surveys, Trillanes claims

/ 04:21 AM May 08, 2013

Sen. Antonio Trillanes IV: How could I believe them? EDWIN BACASMAS

MANILA, Philippines—Reelectionist Sen. Antonio Trillanes IV has accused one of the Big Two polling firms of “massaging” the results of its surveys to benefit paying candidates.

“An ‘operator’ from a major survey firm sent word through my staff that we could get advance (information) on where and when they would conduct a survey, apparently to allow us to massage or cook the results. I’m not sure which one of the two survey firms sent us the message,” Trillanes told a press conference on Monday.

Article continues after this advertisement

The senator was referring to the country’s most cited preelection pollsters—Pulse Asia and Social Weather Stations—that ranked him number 20 and 16, respectively, in their last survey just before the 2007 elections.

FEATURED STORIES

Trillanes finished No. 11 in the final count. Pulse Asia and SWS had pegged Sen. Ralph Recto No. 9 and 7, respectively, in the same surveys but he only ranked 14 in the final results. (Recto ran again in 2010 and finished eighth).

The pollsters apparently missed out on the protest vote for Trillanes and the backlash against Recto for pushing for the expanded value-added tax.

Article continues after this advertisement

Trillanes said that based on his personal experience in 2007, he has largely dismissed the “commercial surveys” in his campaign strategies.

Article continues after this advertisement

“How could I believe them after that? That’s a glaring error,” he said.

Article continues after this advertisement

Based on a comparison by Inquirer research of the actual results and survey forecasts in the last two senatorial elections, SWS and Pulse Asia have been fairly accurate except for one or two misses.

In 2007, Inquirer research showed the average difference between the actual results and survey forecasts were 17.61 percent for SWS and 7.47 percent for Pulse Asia.

Article continues after this advertisement

In 2010, where both survey firms predicted the top 12 vote-getters albeit with varying rankings, the average difference between the actual and forecasts were 2.46 percent for SWS and 3.03 percent for Pulse Asia. Both pollsters were accurate in picking the No. 1 candidate—Sen. Loren Legarda in 2007 and Sen. Ramon Revilla Jr. In 2010.

Advance information

With the advance info on the survey schedule and venue, Trillanes said the candidate would know the areas to visit personally and flood these with campaign materials.

He said he got the message this year but refused to reveal the amount being asked for the advance information.

“I also talked to two other candidates and they told me they were also offered the same service,” said Trillanes.

“We have our own numbers, Malacañang has its own numbers. I am still in the winner’s circle. The surveys are just a guide, the public will be the one who will decide,” he said.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

Trillanes said he could not blame the media for quoting extensively the survey firms’ results during the campaign period.

TAGS: Elections, Pulse Asia, surveys

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.