Group asks SC to affirm constitutionality of RH Law | Inquirer News

Group asks SC to affirm constitutionality of RH Law

/ 02:16 PM May 07, 2013

MANILA, Philippines–Reproductive Health advocates on Tuesday trooped to the Supreme Court and urged it to affirm the constitutionality of Republic Act (RA) No. 10354, also known as the Responsible Parenthood and Reproductive Health Act of 2012, and commonly known as the Reproductive Health Law.

In an open “mothers’ letter” to the high court, they said anti-RH advocates twisted their arguments to support the claim that the law’s provisions on contraceptives and reproductive health education are violative of the 1987 Constitution.

The group insists that the law aims to ensure that women have the freedom of choice and are able to take care of their physical well-being, and that of their unborn child.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Kami po ay nababagabag sa pagbaluktot sa nilalaman ng [Reproductive Health Law] — ang batas na kumikilala sa karapatan ng mga inang magpasya sa sariling katawan at nagtitiyak sa aming kaligtasan mula sa nakamamatay na kumplikasyon ng pagbubuntis at panganganak.

FEATURED STORIES

(We are deeply concerned about the twisting of the contents of Reproductive Health Law – the law that recognizes the rights of mothers to determine what is best for their body in order to prevent us from deadly complications of pregnancy and giving birth.)

They said the law upholds the basic human right to reproductive self-determination in which couples and women are empowered to freely and responsibly determine the number and spacing of their children.

Article continues after this advertisement

They pointed out that 54% of pregnancies and 36% of child births in the Philippines are either unplanned or unwanted.

Petitions have been filed with the high court assailing the constitutionality of the law. The high court on the other hand issued a status quo ante order stopping the implementation of RH Law while case is being heard.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Nation, News, RH law, Supreme Court

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.