Too heavy | Inquirer News
Editorial

Too heavy

/ 06:26 AM August 12, 2011

A crackdown on jaywalking in Cebu City’s streets may be a minor talking point among city officials, but opposition to the proposed amendment to the existing anti-jaywalking ordinance isn’t to be taken lightly.

Aside from students and average wage earners, it’s surprising that the Cebu City Integrated Traffic Operations Management (Citom) registered its opposition to the amendment that would impose a minimum of P200 to a maximum of P1,000 for violators of the jaywalking ordinance.

The City Council didn’t take the Citom opposition lightly and grilled its officials in last Wednesday’s session to verify whether they weren’t taking a cue from Cebu City Mayor Michael Rama, who said he is opposed to the increased fine.

Article continues after this advertisement

The Citom rationale appears reasonable enough and it is largely supported by minimum income earners. The anti-jaywalking ordinance is especially useful in the downtown area in Colon Street populated by schools, vendors and all manner of commercial establishments.

FEATURED STORIES

“Not everyone carries P200 in their pocket. That amount could buy a violator five kilos of rice,” said Brenette Abrenica, a professor of the University of San Carlos in last Wednesday’s session.

True, but then not everyone becomes a violator. If we are to go by the reasoning of the proponents, the amount of fines to be imposed in the amended ordinance would only serve as a deterrent, a reminder to the commuters to always walk the pedestrian lanes and never ever take shortcuts that would only disrupt traffic and inconvenience motorist and commuter alike.

Article continues after this advertisement

The problem arises when there are violators caught. Rama had a point when he said the higher fines would tempt traffic enforcers to become unusually hawkish and meticulous towards people crossing the street.

Article continues after this advertisement

Let’s see, if a traffic enforcer manages to pick up five violators a day, that would already amount to at least P1,000. Skim some fat from the revenue—or probably take it all—then the enforcer would have a tidy sum by the end of two weeks or the month.

Article continues after this advertisement

This is not to say that all traffic enforcers are corrupt or that city residents would find it difficult to observe the anti-jaywalking ordinance. It’s just that updating the ordinance to include higher fines isn’t clearly the way to go.

Instead of the maximum P1,000, why not meet halfway and charge P500 as the maximum amount? Surely the council would have thought about that option last Wednesday.

Article continues after this advertisement

That and tapping the presence of more authorized and professionally trained volunteers to assist the Citom in implementing traffic rules would have quite a considerable effect on vehicular and pedestrian movement in Cebu City.

Thankfully the amendments are still under study. To further buttress their position, the Citom should finish a study on the 10-year implementation of the existing ordinance to see if amending the amount would be an effective check against violators.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Cebu City, jaywalking

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.