Globe Asiatique to Pag-IBIG fund: What P6.5B damages? | Inquirer News

Globe Asiatique to Pag-IBIG fund: What P6.5B damages?

/ 02:58 PM April 30, 2013

MANILA, Philippines – Where is the P6.5-billion damages incurred by the Home Development Mutual Fund (HDMF) from its transactions with Globe Asiatique?

A lawyer from GA raised this question to the Court of Appeals Tuesday.

“We’ve been saying that they are flaunting in the media that they incurred P6.5 billion damages…Sinasabi namin sa hearing, san yun?” GA lawyer Roni Garay told reporters Tuesday.

Article continues after this advertisement

(We’ve been asking at the hearing, where is it?)

FEATURED STORIES

He said the counter-claim is only P12 million. Up to now, Garay said they have yet to receive a demand letter claiming the amount.

HDMF or Pag-IBIG Fund went to the Court of Appeals after Makati City Regional Trial Court Branch 58 ruled that they are liable to GA for specific performance and damages.

Article continues after this advertisement

The Makati Court in 2012 ruled that Pag-IBIG breached its memorandum of agreement (MOA) and funding commitment agreements, which it signed with Globe Asiatique when it refused to accept the replacement buyers being offered by the latter pursuant to the provisions of their contracts.

Article continues after this advertisement

The appeals court affirmed the Makati court’s ruling, saying HDMF can be held liable for the damages sustained by GA when it “acted with malice and bad faith” by failing to accept the replacement of delinquent buyers and borrowers by GA, which are part of the memorandum of agreement and funding commitment agreement.

Article continues after this advertisement

Giray said it was Pag-IBIG that said that the Makati court interpreted all the contract entered into between GA and Pag-IBIG and the court said its really Pag-IBIG who breached.

On the other hand, HDMF lead counsel Sandra Coronel asked the appeals court to stop the implementation of the Makati court ruling.

Article continues after this advertisement

Coronel said they were surprised that the Makati Court issued a summary judgment on the case.

“There was no hearing, no witness testified. The court only said we should follow the contract and accept the replacement borrowers,” Coronel said.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: housing scam, Nation, News

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.