JV Ejercito denies offshore firm, says 'demolition job' has begun | Inquirer News

JV Ejercito denies offshore firm, says ‘demolition job’ has begun

/ 11:55 AM April 05, 2013

San Juan Representative Joseph Victor “JV” Ejercito Estrada. INQUIRER FILE PHOTO

QUEZON, Philippines — Still smarting from the report that he snubbed Senator Jose “Jinggoy” Estrada’s daughter, San Juan Representative Joseph Victor “JV” Ejercito Estrada now has to fend off allegations about his alleged ownership of an offshore corporation.

Estrada believes that the attacks were similar to those on his father, former President Joseph Estrada.

Article continues after this advertisement

“It’s Erap bashing all over again. We know who they are. Its 2001 all over again,” he said in a text message, referring to the year when the former President was ousted and jailed for charges of plunder.

FEATURED STORIES

Estrada on Thursday denied having snubbed Janella Estrada during the United Nationalist Alliance’s (UNA) rally in San Juan City, an issue which prompted Senator Estrada to air his disappointment with his half-brother.

He also denied information a Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism report that he owned a company called Ice Bell Properties Limited in the British Virgin Islands.

Article continues after this advertisement

The company was not declared in Estrada’s statement of assets, liabilities and net worth (SALN), according to the PCIJ report.

Article continues after this advertisement

But the lawmaker maintained that he “truthfully and accurately” declared his assets, liabilities and net worth and questioned instead the timing of the report on his supposed offshore company.

Article continues after this advertisement

“(The) demolition job has started. First they hit on my character by snubbing my niece, now its accounts and properties in question,” said Estrada.

Asked who he thought was behind such efforts, Estrada said that it could be “another fellow candidate probably fanning this demo job to cover up his own issues.”

Article continues after this advertisement

“Because they cannot find anything irregular in my stint as a public official, no onerous or anomalous contracts or transactions, that is why they need to dig into the past,” he said.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Elections, Politics

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.