SC grants motion to cancel oral argument on cybercrime law | Inquirer News

SC grants motion to cancel oral argument on cybercrime law

By: - Reporter / @T2TupasINQ
/ 02:04 PM January 22, 2013

The Supreme Court building in Manila. INQUIRER FILE PHOTO

MANILA, Philippines–The Supreme Court postponed the oral argument on the petition against the Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012 to next week upon the request of the government lawyer.

Solicitor General Francis Jardeleza, the lead government counsel, told the high court that he was requested by President Benigno Aquino III to seek the postponement.

Article continues after this advertisement

Acting spokesperson lawyer Gleo Guerra said the oral argument is rescheduled next Tuesday, January 29.

FEATURED STORIES

The postponement surprised the petitioners among them lawyer JJ Disini.

“… I only found out as I was walking in, everyone was going out [of the hall],” Disini told reporters.

Article continues after this advertisement

He said he was a bit dismayed by the delay.

Article continues after this advertisement

“They were, in effect, given more time to prepare their arguments. Our only hope is that by next week, there is already a resolution on our motion to extend the restraining order,” Disini said.

The restraining order against the implementation of the Cybercrime Prevention Act will lapse on February 5. The petitioners sought an extension of the TRO. Chief Justice Maria Lourdes Sereno said last week that it will be discussed in future court sessions.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Crime, Supreme Court

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.