Another disqualified partylist seeks reprieve from SC | Inquirer News

Another disqualified partylist seeks reprieve from SC

By: - Reporter / @T2TupasINQ
/ 03:07 PM January 07, 2013

MANILA, Philippines -The Alliance of Concerned Transport Organization Inc. (ACTO) asked the Supreme Court to reverse the Commission on Elections (Comelec) ruling disqualifying them from participating in the 2013 elections.

In a 26-page petition for certiorari, ACTO said Comelec abused its discretion when it ignored the second division’s ruling granting its accreditation as a sectoral organization under the partylist system of representation.

ACTO added that Comelec en banc violated its rights to due process and equal protection of laws saying they were disqualified without allowing them to air their side and defend their accreditation.

Article continues after this advertisement

“The setting aside of the resolution allowing registration was arbitrary and despotic. The reasons given for withdrawing the grant of registration or accreditation—possible conflict of interest between the drivers and the operators, and the alleged disqualification of ACTO’s second nominee— are not provided for by R.A. No. 7941,” the petition read.

FEATURED STORIES

ACTO represents operators and drivers of public transport vehicles, claims to have some 265,000 members nationwide.

ACTO was accredited by the Comelec in 2004 but was later delisted for failure to participate in the 2007 elections and for failure to secure 2% of the votes in the 2004 polls.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Comelec, Nation, News, partylist

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.