Gov’t can still appeal decision on SMC—SC spokesman | Inquirer News

Gov’t can still appeal decision on SMC—SC spokesman

By: - Reporter / @T2TupasINQ
/ 12:58 PM April 13, 2011

MANILA, Philippines—The government can still contest the Supreme Court’s decision declaring that the 20 percent stake of businessman Eduardo “Danding” Cojuangco Jr. in San Miguel Corporation is not ill gotten.

Supreme Court administrator and spokesman Jose Midas Marquez said Wednesday that the government still has 15 days upon receipt of the resolution to file a motion for reconsideration of the high court’s decision.

“The decision is not yet final, they can still file a motion for reconsideration,” Marquez said.

Article continues after this advertisement

SMC is the country’s biggest food and beverage conglomerate, which has diversified into power generation, telecommunications and other businesses.

FEATURED STORIES

On Tuesday, the high court affirmed a 2007 decision issued by the Sandiganbayan and declared “that the block of shares in SMC in the names of respondents Cojuangco et al. … is the exclusive property of Cojuangco et al. as registered owners.”

The government had been contesting 20 percent of SMC’s capital stock or 16,276,879 shares that Cojuangco allegedly acquired through the coco levy when he headed the United Coconut Planters Bank. (SMC closed Tuesday at P153 a share in the Philippine Stock Exchange and San Miguel Brewery Inc. at P30.6.)

Article continues after this advertisement

The government maintains that the coco levy is public in nature, which means that the state owns 20 percent of the SMC stocks in the name of Cojuangco et al.

Article continues after this advertisement

But the high court said the government failed to establish the preponderance of evidence showing that the shares were illegally acquired.

“Republic’s burden to establish by preponderance of evidence that respondents’ SMC shares had been illegally acquired with coconut levy funds was not discharged,” the high court added.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Government, Judiciary

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.