Palace should have denied Trillanes role, says military analyst | Inquirer News

Palace should have denied Trillanes role, says military analyst

/ 01:28 AM September 21, 2012

There should have been no controversy had the Palace not acknowledged Sen. Antonio Trillanes IV’s unofficial role in the negotiations with China.

Retired Commodore Rex Robles, a military analyst, said Thursday that agents sent to back-channel talks were never acknowledged.

Whether the talks are a success or a failure, the backroom negotiator “is out of the picture,” Robles said.

Article continues after this advertisement

Any commendation given in recognition of his work is usually burned. “Only the ashes of that burned sheet of paper is given to the negotiator,” Robles said.

FEATURED STORIES

Robles said he was surprised when Malacañang confirmed Trillanes’ claim that he was the government’s backroom negotiator in the West Philippine Sea dispute.

Amateurish

Article continues after this advertisement

“President Aquino should have denied it outright,” Robles said, adding that Malacañang’s handling of the disclosure was “amateurish.”

Article continues after this advertisement

Trillanes’ disclosure and his behavior in the Senate on Wednesday also disappointed his political patron, former President Joseph Estrada.

Article continues after this advertisement

Estrada said Thursday that he regretted supporting Trillanes’ candidacy in 2007.

“He has become a swellhead,” Estrada said in phone interview with reporters. “It’s good his head still fits in an elevator.”

Article continues after this advertisement

Estrada said supporting Trillanes was one of his biggest mistakes. “I really regret supporting him,” he said.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: China, Government, Philippines, Politics, Rex Robles, Senate

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.