Abad, Sereno end budget war | Inquirer News

Abad, Sereno end budget war

Budget Secretary Florencio Abad and Chief Justice Maria Lourdes Sereno PHOTOS/INQUIRER.net and AP

With the Supreme Court under a friendlier force, Budget Secretary Florencio Abad on Wednesday visited Chief Justice Ma. Lourdes Sereno and her court to talk about the once thorny issue between the two branches of government: the judiciary’s P17.7-billion budget and the control of its special allowances.

It was the first time in a long while that the two branches of government made an effort to sit down and discuss the matter.

Article continues after this advertisement

Except for Associate Justices Antonio Carpio and Arturo Brion, who were absent, Sereno led the 12 other justices in an almost two-hour-long meeting with Abad at the Supreme Court.

FEATURED STORIES

The two branches had clashed before on the issue of the judiciary’s budget, particularly the return to the National Treasury of collected docket fees, which are used for special allowances and benefits of court personnel. Then  Chief Justice Renato Corona opposed this, insisting  on the judiciary’s financial independence.

Abad’s visit to  the Supreme Court also came at a time when Sereno, barely two weeks into her new job, was reported to be having some problems with some of the senior justices.

Article continues after this advertisement

Asked whether his presence there was somehow a statement of support of President Benigno Aquino for Sereno given her current dilemma with other justices, Abad merely said he was there upon the invitation of Sereno.

Article continues after this advertisement

“There’s a new leadership and (Sereno) just wanted to be familiar with the budget process,” he told reporters, after the meeting.

Article continues after this advertisement

Abad also said that the budget department makes visits “to every department that invites us.”

When pressed on the issues that were discussed at the meeting, Abad declined to reveal specifics.

Article continues after this advertisement

“We agreed that they (the justices) are going to talk about this. This is really their concern,” said Abad of the judicial allowances.

Abad said the meeting was “a good opportunity” for the two branches of government to get together. He described their exchanges to be “cordial, open and frank.”

Senator Franklin Drilon, chairman of the finance committee, said he had finished the hearings of the judiciary’s budget and will submit a committee report to the plenary in the third week of November.

Drilon said that one of the issues that the committee needed  to resolve involved the Special Allowances for the Judiciary (SAJ).

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

The Department of Budget and Management wants the SAJ, which are funds realized out of the collection of docket fees in courts, returned to the National Treasury, arguing that its original purpose, which was to serve as an advance on the salary benefits of court personnel, had been fulfilled. The judiciary opposed this position.

TAGS: Government, Judiciary, State budget

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.