Tourism chief cool to Imelda Marcos gems exhibit | Inquirer News

Tourism chief cool to Imelda Marcos gems exhibit

By: - Reporter / @KatyYam
/ 12:39 AM September 06, 2012

ALL AGLOW The ageless Imelda Marcos on her 79th birthday on July 2, 2008. At left are some of her favorite things. Her sequestered jewels under lock and key at Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas are divided into 3 caches: Palace collection, 300 pieces left behind in Malacañang; Honolulu collection, 400 pieces seized by US customs in Hawaii; and Roumeliotes collection, 60 pieces confiscated from Imelda’s Greek friend at the Manila airport. PHOTO TAKEN FROM WWW.DJL.NET/AP/INQUIRER PHOTO

Would the notorious background of Imelda Marcos’ jewelry be enough come-on for tourists to travel all the way to Manila to view them?

Newly confirmed Tourism Secretary Ramon Jimenez raised this question Wednesday following reports that the Presidential Commission on Good Government (PCGG) wants his department to exhibit the former first lady’s jewelry before a planned auction.

Article continues after this advertisement

More specifically, the PCGG wants the Department of Tourism to showcase the Iron Butterfly’s gems at the Metropolitan Museum of Manila, a stone’s throw from the vault of the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas where the famed jewelry are kept.

FEATURED STORIES

Jimenez remains cool to the idea, especially the part where PCGG Chairman Andres Bautista thinks the “notoriety” of the jewels’ former owner would add premium to the collection and attract curiosity-seekers.

The secretary said the PCGG proposal was “something that has to be evaluated. Any exhibit is possible but I have to see it first.”

Article continues after this advertisement

The PCGG said the recommendation to display the jewelry was given to Jimenez in March. The secretary  told reporters, however, that the commission made the proposal “before my time.”

Article continues after this advertisement

Jimenez has been heading the Department of Tourism for almost a year.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Just because it’s jewelry doesn’t mean it’s touristic so I will (have to) see . . . . Notoriety is not exactly the best way to attract tourists,” the secretary said.

“I do not look at implications other than the fact that it’s possibly an opportunity for our people to draw in more tourists.  If that is what (PCGG officials) think it is,” he added.

Article continues after this advertisement

Bautista said the PCGG already got a call from the international auction house Sotheby’s expressing interest in auctioning off Imelda’s jewelry.

 

Elizabeth Taylor, Jackie O

While estimates put the jewelry collection’s value between $10 million and $20 million, Bautista believes the former first lady’s “notoriety” could push her seized jewelry’s value up.

Bautista was apparently thinking of the precedent set by the sale of jewelry owned by other famous women, including Elizabeth Taylor, Jacqueline Kennedy-Onassis and the Duchess of Windsor. The jewels these personalities had owned fetched figures way beyond the expectations of auctioneers.

Marcos lived the life of a bon vivant with an unlimited shopping allowance during her late husband’s presidency.

When Ferdinand Marcos escaped to Honolulu at the height of the Edsa People Power Revolution in 1986, his wife brought along with her  400 pieces of jewelry that were later seized by the US Bureau of Customs.

This was apart from the roughly 300 pieces of jewelry, left behind in Malacañang when the Marcos family fled in haste to Clark Air Base before flying to Hawaii.

The Philippine government also keeps the so-called Roumeliotes collection of 60 pieces of jewelry, named after the ex-first lady’s alleged Greek accomplice, Demetriou Roumeliotes, who was caught trying to smuggle the items out of the country a few weeks after the Marcoses left.

The Roumeliotes collection is believed to be the most expensive, as it includes a 37-carat diamond.

 

Exhibit OK with Sen. Marcos

At the Senate Wednesday, Imelda’s son, Senator Ferdinand “Bongbong” Marcos Jr., said his mother had thought of displaying her jewelry when they were still in power.

But putting the jewelry up for auction would be a different and more difficult issue, he said.

The senator recalled having family talks in which his mother’s famed jewels were discussed.

“I remember we talked about it several times. She asked, ‘What shall I do with these?’ The family agreed to put it on public display because the people deserve to see them,” he said in Filipino.

Which means the PCGG plan to exhibit his mother’s gems is a welcome move.

Missing items

Senator Marcos noted, however, that his mother once complained that there were many pieces missing after reading a list of her seized jewelry provided by the commission.

“I have no idea how many pieces are no longer accounted for but when we once asked for the list from the PCGG, my mother noted that many were not on the list,” he told reporters.

“The question she asked was ‘Bakit konti na lang ‘yun?’” the senator added.

Gifts from dad

Not being the sentimental type, the younger Marcos said he did not recall a specific piece that would elicit memories for him.

“I know it’s valuable and beautiful. I recall some pieces that my dad gave my mother on her birthday or at Christmas. I’m sure she can tell you which ones,” he said.

The senator turned grim when asked about the PCGG plan to put the pieces up for sale.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

“Has it already been decided that these jewelry transferred ownership? Or is the whole case still in limbo? I’m not following the case very intently but I can tell you, she did not just get those jewelry. She bought those (hindi naman basta kinuha lang ‘yun, siya ang bumili nun),” he said.

TAGS: DoT, PCGG, Ramon Jimenez, Tourism

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.