Photo taken from nyc.gov
NEW YORK — A gay man and his long-time partner decide to become parents using a surrogate mother. Shortly after their son is born, the couple gets married. But there’s a catch for this modern family: A will left by the man’s wealthy father decrees that he must marry the mother for the child to collect an inheritance.
That quandary has prompted the man, Manhattan Criminal Court Judge Robert M. Mandelbaum, to contest the will in court.
Mandelbaum has filed a petition on behalf of his now 2-year-old son, Cooper, arguing that a condition that might “induce the beneficiary to enter into a sham marriage of convenience” should be invalid.
The petition makes two further arguments: that Mandelbaum’s partner could be considered the boy’s “mother,” and that excluding the boy from sharing in the family fortune would run counter to public policies protecting same-sex marriages and their offspring.
The petition portrays the father as being accepting of his son’s orientation. But the will doesn’t make clear why the father appeared to contradict that when it came to his estate.
An attorney for Mandelbaum declined comment on Thursday.
A proposed settlement reached by Mandelbaum and the guardians of two other grandchildren that would give equal stakes in a trust set up by the grandfather is pending court approval, though it could be a longshot.
Joshua S. Rubenstein, a Manhattan lawyer specializing in estate planning, said decedents have a right to shun possible beneficiaries — whether it’s because they have two fathers or because they married someone of a different race or any other reason that might sound unreasonable or even cruel.
“We might all find that repugnant, but it’s your property and you can do whatever you want with it,” Rubenstein said.
Mandelbaum may have “a very strong public policy argument, but the (father’s) wishes may be controlling in this case,” said Laura E. Stegossi, a Philadelphia estates lawyer.
The 47-year-old Mandelbaum is the son of Frank Mandelbaum, a successful Long Island businessman who died in 2007. The father was chairman and chief executive of Intelli-Check, a Woodbury, New York-based maker of software that verifies the authenticity of driver’s licenses and other forms of identification.
The elder Mandelbaum’s will set up a trust worth hundreds of thousands for his grandchildren and their decedents. However, the will excluded any “adopted child of Robert, if adopted while Robert is a single person or a biological child of Robert … if Robert shall not be married to the child’s mother within six months of the child’s birth.”
According to court documents, Mandelbaum is the biological father of Cooper, who was born in Pomona, California, on April, 5, 2010. The boy was conceived by using his sperm to fertilize an egg from an anonymous donor that was then implanted in the uterus of a second woman.
Mandelbaum’s petition notes that a California birth certificate lists him as the “Father/Parent” and his partner, a tax lawyer, as the “Mother/Parent.” The pair married in Connecticut on July 2, 2010 — within six months of Cooper’s birth.
The petition argues that the disputed provision in the will was intended only to “ensure that any children born to Robert were raised in the context of a legally recognized and committed marital relationship.”
Mandelbaum’s father knew his son was in a committed relationship with another man, and frequently socialized and traveled with them, the papers add.
“Thus if it was the intent of the will were to require that Robert marry a woman, the will would thereby reflect an attempt to induce the breakup of an existing family,” they say. “Any will provision reflecting such an intent is likewise unenforceable as against public policy.”