Obsolete reform tool?

To jump-start  the long-stalled  Freedom of  Information bill,  journalists  designated  August 15  as FOI  Day. They  “pledged to publish and upload a pooled editorial”  to prod  a skittish  House of  Representatives to act. Ma. Ceres Doyo  ran  the text  in her Inquirer column titled: “Push, pass the FOI  act now!”

 
The first-ever “pooled editorial” in local journalism skewered  “compartmentalized justice” of  the then decaying “New Society.”  All  dailies ran it  on the same day.  Radio stations broadcast  the text along with the new kid on the block then –  TV news programs. President  Ferdinand Marcos went ballistic.

 
At  the Philippine Press  Institute, we rechecked  drafts that  publishers blue-penciled.  We were   wet-behind-the-ears journalists then. Our job included ensuring the pooled editorial clattered out on  teletype machines. The editorial  set a precedent. As a greenhorn, the   innovation didn’t  fully register on us then.

 
Malacañang  phone calls to went to Institute members with less grit than Joaquin “Chino”  Roces. When a follow-up  pooled editorial was proposed,  the now defunct Evening  News hastily bailed out. Others waffled. Thus, a second pooled editorial never materialized.

 
Marcos got his pound of  flesh under Proclamation 1081. He  jailed Roces and Manila Chronicle  publisher Eugenio Lopez. He  padlocked the Times, the Philippines Free Press, and ironically even papers that buckled.  In between, Marcos  enticed publishers into his camp.

 
At an Institute meeting in the old Capitol Publishing compound, Manila Bulletin’s Hans Menzi revealed that  he’d sign on as  Marcos’  senior military aide. There was stunned silence. In the presiding officer’s chair,  then UP president Carlos P.  Romulo  shifted uneasily. Chino Roces twirled his cigar. Philippine News Service’s Romeo Abundo gagged on his  coffee.

 
“If you were publishing laundry lists, I’d have no objections,” the courtly Don Ramon Roces  finally said. “But  Hans, my  friend –  you’re publishing a newspaper.”

 
The rest is now history, including  the November 2005  Supreme Court decision  that declared  198,052  Manila Bulletin shares  were the  “ill-gotten wealth of the defendant Marcos spouses.” Singapore’s Supreme Court ruled this week that $23 million in stashed Marcos assets be returned to Philippine National Bank.

 
Technology, ownership to cyberspace  altered the “pooled editorial”. Sun Star for example, periodically runs a “pooled editorial” in it’s syndicated network members.

Would metropolitan  publishers of  varying  persuasions and economic interests agree on a pool?   Twitter and Facebook impinge  on newsrooms. Is this the “pool” an outdated “measure of last resort”?

 
The medium is not the message, as today’s controversy over  FOI  shows. Information ushers in transparency, the anchor of good governance. Section 7 of the Constitution provides for the citizen’s right to public information. State policy seeks full disclosure of transactions involving public interest.

 
After dawdling  for months, President  Aquino, who pledged in his campaign to press for an FOI bill,  gave the green light for the measure in January.  `“We acknowledge efforts by reformers in the executive branch, namely Budget Secretary Florencio ‘Butch’ Abad and Information Undersecretary Manuel L. Quezon III,   “The Right to Know, Right Now! Coalition” said.

 
That  sense of relief  came from being scalded by  experience.  Pro-Macapagal-Arroyo congressmen sabotaged the  FOI  in  the 14th Congress’ closing  day. Prospero Nograles (Davao) and Pedro Romualdo (Camiguin) led a coalition that killed the FOI bill. It  needed  merely a few minutes for ratification. But  the regime  hefted the old dodge of questioning the quorum.

 
Only 128 House members showed up – seven short of the 135 needed in a House of 268 members. After the “slaughter”, journalists tracked text messages from the House leadership to stay away. Thus, 140 truants strangled FOI.

 
The day after the Lower House strangled   the bill, President Aquin  pledged to fast track the FOI Act. Quezon Rep. Lorenzo “Erin” Tanada predicted early approval of a reintroduced measure. That would  make FOI the “very first legacy” of the 15th Congress under the Aquino III administration.

 
That did not come to pass. The 15th  Congress is now  meandering to a close. Were   those  January  well-wishes premature? Yes, says  the proposed “pooled editorial” draft.
The Right to Know  coalition prodded Eastern Samar Rep. Ben Evardone  to “transform rhetoric into reality.” The Eastern Samar congressmen, who preens about  his earlier incarnation as a journalist, heads the House committee on public information. He  failed to harmonize 15 versions of  FOI bill  in his committee.

 
After the State-of-the-Nation address, Evardone promised, he d  put the FOI bill “in the front burner” .Well, SONA  3 has  come  and gone. Evardone’s  pledge hasn’t been redeemed.

 
“Executive agencies have become more transparent anyway,” other spokesmen insist `The Department for Budget and Management, under Secretary Florencio “Butch”  Abad, uploads unprecedented amounts of public fund  data  from pork barrel to  projects.

 
These welcome reforms, need to be institutionalized. Benigno Aquino III will not be president forever. The 16th  President ( It does not have to be Jejomar Binay ) can scrap those reforms with the stroke of a pen.

 
“Media’s power is frail. Without the people’s support, it can be shut off with the ease of turning a light switch’,  Corazon Aquino always warned.

Read more...