US sends message to Syria, Congress with diplomacy

WASHINGTON—The Obama administration sent two distinct messages by dispatching the US ambassador to Syria to meet anti-regime protesters in a besieged city. To Syrian President Bashar Assad: Reform now. To critics in the United States of its engagement policy: Stop complaining.

Greeted by demonstrators with roses and cheers, the envoy, Robert Ford, finished a two-day trip Friday to the restive city of Hama aimed at driving home the message that the United States stands with those in the Syrian streets braving a brutal government crackdown.

The visit prompted fierce reaction from the Syrian government and a renewed American warning that Assad was failing to stabilize his country by satisfying the democratic yearnings of his people.

Ford “had a chance to talk to lots of average citizens; these were shopkeepers, people out on the street, young men,” said Victoria Nuland, the State Department spokeswoman. “When he got into the city, the car was immediately surrounded by friendly protesters who were putting flowers on the windshield, they were putting olive branches on the car, they were chanting ‘Down with the regime!’ It was quite a scene.”

So far, the US government has refused to suggest an end to the Assad family’s four-decade dynasty. The government’s harsh repression of dissent has escalated the crisis with protesters increasingly demanding Assad’s removal after 11 years full of promises of democratic reform but little change from the iron-fisted rule of his father.

The Obama administration has grown increasingly disgusted with the violence in Syria that has claimed the lives of 1,600 people plus 350 members of the security forces. Yet it has not mustered sufficient international outrage to secure a UN condemnation of Assad’s government or a unified global demand that he step down.

The administration cannot press too hard by itself because the threat of military action would not be taken seriously while it is trying to wind down wars in neighboring Iraq and in Afghanistan, and struggling to justify its participation in an international coalition against Moammar Gadhafi in Libya.

The solution has been to balance stinging criticism of the Assad regime’s conduct with continued pleas for it to lead a democratic transition. Still, the measured approach has faced a clamoring at home and in Syria for tougher action.

There has been no US ambassador in Syria for the five previous years in protest of alleged Syrian involvement in the assassination of a Lebanese Prime Minister Rafiq Hariri, a steadfast critic of Syria’s domination of his country.

Republican members of Congress have challenged Ford’s continued presence in the country, characterizing it as an unwarranted reward to Assad’s often pro-Iran and anti-US government stances, and untenable in light of recent violence against civilians.

Ford’s participation in a Syrian government-organized trip to the country’s north last month did not help. The State Department said then that Ford’s outing to the abandoned town of Jisr al-Shughour allowed him to “see for himself the results of the Syrian government’s brutality.” However, he mostly encountered deserted streets and buildings that would not prove the existence of a foreign conspiracy to destabilize Syria, as the government claims, or mass atrocities, as Western governments and human rights groups allege.

Ford has been rebuffed in several attempts to speak directly with senior Syrian officials.

“Any continued presence of a US ambassador will either be used by the regime for propaganda purposes or just plain ignored,” Republican Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, chairwoman of the House of Representatives Foreign Affairs Committee, said last month. Ros-Lehtinen said Ford’s participation in the government trip “compromised US credibility with freedom and pro-democracy advocates within Syria.”

US officials nevertheless insist that Ford is serving a vital role in making American concerns known to the Syrian government and providing assessments to policymakers back in Washington. Beyond that, he is providing moral support to protesters, officials say.

Ford’s trip allowed him to see firsthand the lies of the Syrian regime, Nuland told reporters. While the government blames foreign instigators or armed gangs for unrest, Ford “witnessed average Syrians asking for change in their country,” she said.

In recent days, Hama residents have largely sealed off their city, setting up makeshift checkpoints with burning tires and concrete blocks to keep security forces away.

The government seized on Ford’s visit to insist that foreign conspirators lay behind the unrest and called it proof the US was inciting violence in the Arab nation. The US is trying to “aggravate the situations which destabilize Syria,” the state-run news agency said Friday.

Nuland called the claim “absolute rubbish.”

“The reason for his visit was to stand in solidarity with the right of the Syrian people to demonstrate peacefully,” she said.

Nuland also disputed the Syrian argument that Ford’s trip was unauthorized, explaining that the US Embassy informed the government ahead of time.

“They really need to focus their attention on what their citizens have to say, rather than on spending their time picking at Ambassador Ford,” Nuland said.

Ford left Hama during Friday prayers ahead of what are usually the week’s largest protests. He returned to Damascus safely Friday afternoon.

Separately Friday, the State Department said it summoned Syria’s ambassador to the US earlier this week after receiving alarming reports of Syrian diplomats conducting video and photographic surveillance of people participating in protests in the United States.

The US government is also investigating claims that Assad’s government targeted Syrian family members of demonstrators in retaliation, a statement said.