Sotto: People misunderstand SC ruling on Senate leadership plea

Sotto: People misunderstand SC ruling on Senate leadership petition

/ 01:34 PM June 11, 2026
Sen. Vicente Sotto III on Thursday said some people have misunderstood the Supreme Court’s (SC) decision to dismiss a petition related to the dispute over the Senate leadership.
Sen. Vicente Sotto lll. INQUIRER FILE PHOTO / NIÑO JESUS ORBETA

MANILA, Philippines — Sen. Vicente Sotto III on Thursday said some people have misunderstood the Supreme Court’s (SC) decision to dismiss a petition related to the dispute over the Senate leadership.

“Some people misunderstand it. The petition is not justiciable; therefore no need for SC to take it up,” Sotto said in a message sent to Senate reporters.

His statement came after the Supreme Court En Banc dismissed the petition filed by high school teacher Barry Tayam against Senators Alan Peter Cayetano, Pia Cayetano, and Loren Legarda.

Article continues after this advertisement

On Wednesday, the high court said it dismissed the petition for lack of legal standing, ruling that Tayam “failed to show that he suffered, or was at imminent risk of suffering, any direct injury from the actions he challenged.”

FEATURED STORIES

READ: SC junks taxpayer suit over Senate row

Tayam had asked the SC to declare the presence of 12 senators during the June 3, 2026, session of the 20th Congress as a valid quorum.

Following the dismissal of the case, supporters of the bloc led by Cayetano claimed online that the ruling amounted to a victory for their camp in the ongoing dispute over the Senate presidency.

Sotto, however, said in Filipino, “Many are under wishful thinking, trying to fool people into thinking that the 12 of 23  [quorum] is wrong.”

Article continues after this advertisement

READ: SC junks teacher’s petition on Senate session for lack of legal standing

The dispute stemmed from the June 3 Senate session, during which the election of Senate officers triggered competing claims over the chamber’s leadership.

Article continues after this advertisement

The SC did not rule on the validity of the quorum or the actions taken during the June 3 session.

Instead, its ruling was limited to the issue of legal standing, finding that Tayam was not the proper party to bring the petition before the tribunal. /jpv /atm

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: News, quorum, Senate, Supreme Court, Vicente Sotto III

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2026 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved