Equitable solution | Inquirer News

Equitable solution

06:50 AM July 08, 2011

Vice President Jejomar Binay made a stop in Cebu City amid  what  his staff described as  a cross country tour to discuss solutions to  problems of illegal settlers.

Binay could have handled the plight of the Mahiga Creek settlers.  After all, he did promise to help resolve their problem at the height of the May demolition dispute between the Cebu City Council and Mayor Michael Rama. But parachuting national government officials don’t get to pick the issues at hand so the vice president had to settle for the  93-1 lot dispute between the city and the province, which has been dragging for five years.

The parties had plenty to say at Wednesday’s  forum.

ADVERTISEMENT

Rep. Tomas Osmeña of Cebu City’s south district took yet another opportunity to publicly berate his successor, Rama,  for torpedoing negotiations between Cebu City Hall and the Capitol with his “dawat limpyo” remark in 2007.

FEATURED STORIES

Despite their disagreements, Rama, Binay and Osmeña  agreed on one thing: the Capitol  holds the key to the solution of the plight of urban poor settlers  occupying lots in Cebu City covered by Provincial Ordinance 93-1.

Osmeña accurately pointed out that it is the seeming lack of sincerity of the Capitol administration to settle the issue.

If we go by Cebu Gov. Gwendolyn Garcia’s pronouncement that the province “holds the cards” in the dispute,  the province wants to dictate  terms of the settlement.

It remains to be seen whether the terms benefit the occupants.

Mayor Rama is likely to support any solution proposed by the Capitol,   which won’t win him friends in the City Council, notably Councilor Alvin Dizon, the urban poor champion in the council, who tangled with Rama over the demolition of shanties in Mahiga Creek.

The  93-1 lot problem is right up the alley of Binay  as chairman of the government’s housing program. However, it’s a  significant change of course for Binay considering that it was Interior and Local Governments Secretary Jesse Robredo,  who has been talking with Garcia and Rama over the 93-1 lot dispute.

ADVERTISEMENT

Binay’s folksy approach (“Let’s have a happy compromise”) would complement Robredo’s measured negotiations.

It  still boils down to the Capitol’s sincerity  to agree to terms allowing over 3,000 remaining families  buy the lots they occupy, a privilege that was cut off when Garcia took office in 2004 and a 10-year grace period ended.

Occupants hope they can still pay at 1993 land prices of less than P1,000 per square meter.

To be equitable, an assessment of the actual earning capacity of each beneficiary and full accounting of  their payments should be made.

That would be fair for both settlers and the province.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

The 93-1 lots are not freebies. Neither should they be  priced beyond the reach of the occupants.

TAGS:

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.